See the following post for some background:
Entity framework one to zero or one relationship without navigation property
I had always thought that Fore
The required side of the 1..0 relationship MemberDataSet
should not have a FK to DeferredData
. Instead, DeferredData
's PK should also be a FK to MemberDataSet
(known as shared primary key)
public class MemberDataSet
{
[Key]
[DatabaseGeneratedAttribute(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int Id { get; set; }
public virtual DeferredData DeferredData { get; set; }
}
public class DeferredData
{
// DeferredData.Id is both the PK and a FK to MemberDataSet
[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated( DatabaseGeneratedOption.None )]
[ForeignKey( "MemberDataSet" )]
public int Id { get; set; }
[Required]
public virtual MemberDataSet MemberDataSet { get; set; }
}
Fluent API:
modelBuilder.Entity<MemberDataSet>()
.HasOptional( mds => mds.DeferredData )
.WithRequired()
.WillCascadeOnDelete();
I think that your original idea was correct, with one slight exception. By putting the foreign key on the MemberDataSet
you are implying that you would like a zero-or-one-to-many relationship.
In your example, MemberDataSet.DeferredData
is optional, and DeferredData
can be referred to by many MemberDataSet
instances.
In fluent syntax this would be expressed by:
modelBuilder.Entity<MemberDataSet>()
.HasOptional(dataSet => dataSet.DeferredData)
.WithMany()
.HasForeignKey(deferredData => deferredData.DeferredDataId);
In order to make this a one-to-zero-or-one property you can put a unique (where not null) key constraint on MemberDataSet's DeferredDataId column. This would mean that a DeferredData entity could only be referred to by a single MemberDataSet entity.
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX unique_MemberDataSet_DeferredDataId ON MemberDataSet(DeferredDataId) WHERE DeferredDataId IS NOT NULL
Note: This type of filtered key is only available in SQL Server 2008 and up.
I think you were right (provided that I understand you right). [ForeignKeyAttribute]
is used on the coresponding foreign key. Not on the primary key of your linked object.
This is my object, and the foreign key is DeferredDataId
Neither the Id
within your object is the foreign key (it's primary key) nor the ID
of the linked object is the foreign key (it's the primary key of the other side of the relation)
Hope I understood you correctly :) Because I'm not sure.