I don't know why you are against a for loop (presumably you meant a for loop
, not specifically for..in
), they are fast and easy to read. Anyhow, here's some options.
For loop:
function getByValue(arr, value) {
for (var i=0, iLen=arr.length; i<iLen; i++) {
if (arr[i].b == value) return arr[i];
}
}
.filter
function getByValue2(arr, value) {
var result = arr.filter(function(o){return o.b == value;} );
return result? result[0] : null; // or undefined
}
.forEach
function getByValue3(arr, value) {
var result = [];
arr.forEach(function(o){if (o.b == value) result.push(o);} );
return result? result[0] : null; // or undefined
}
If, on the other hand you really did mean for..in and want to find an object with any property with a value of 6, then you must use for..in unless you pass the names to check.
Example
function getByValue4(arr, value) {
var o;
for (var i=0, iLen=arr.length; i<iLen; i++) {
o = arr[i];
for (var p in o) {
if (o.hasOwnProperty(p) && o[p] == value) {
return o;
}
}
}
}