python catch exception and continue try block

Question

Can I return to executing try-block after exception occurs? (The goal is to write less) For Example:

try:
    do_smth1()
except:
    pass

try:
    do_smth2(         


        

Answer 1

You can achieve what you want, but with a different syntax. You can use a "finally" block after the try/except. Doing this way, python will execute the block of code regardless the exception was thrown, or not.

Like this:

try:
    do_smth1()
except:
    pass
finally:
    do_smth2()

But, if you want to execute do_smth2() only if the exception was not thrown, use a "else" block:

try:
    do_smth1()
except:
    pass
else:
    do_smth2()

You can mix them too, in a try/except/else/finally clause. Have fun!

Answer 2

special_func to avoid try-except repetition:

def special_func(test_case_dict):
    final_dict = {}
    exception_dict = {}

    def try_except_avoider(test_case_dict):

        try:
            for k,v in test_case_dict.items():
                final_dict[k]=eval(v) #If no exception evaluate the function and add it to final_dict

        except Exception as e:
            exception_dict[k]=e #extract exception
            test_case_dict.pop(k)
            try_except_avoider(test_case_dict) #recursive function to handle remaining functions

        finally:  #cleanup
            final_dict.update(exception_dict)
            return final_dict #combine exception dict and  final dict

    return try_except_avoider(test_case_dict) 

Run code:

def add(a,b):
    return (a+b)
def sub(a,b):
    return (a-b)
def mul(a,b):
    return (a*b)

case = {"AddFunc":"add(8,8)","SubFunc":"sub(p,5)","MulFunc":"mul(9,6)"}
solution = special_func(case)

Output looks like:

{'AddFunc': 16, 'MulFunc': 54, 'SubFunc': NameError("name 'p' is not defined")}

To convert to variables:

locals().update(solution)

Variables would look like:

AddFunc = 16, MulFunc = 54, SubFunc = NameError("name 'p' is not defined")

Answer 3

I don't think you want to do this. The correct way to use a try statement in general is as precisely as possible. I think it would be better to do:

try:
    do_smth1()
except Stmnh1Exception:
    # handle Stmnh1Exception

try:
    do_smth2()
except Stmnh2Exception:
    # handle Stmnh2Exception