I have an item class and a compact \"modifier\" class:
.item { ... }
.item.compact { /* styles to make .item smaller */ }
This is fine. How
For the record, here is how I ended up solving the problem with only duplicating generated styles once:
// This is where the actual compact styles live
@mixin compact-mixin { /* ... */ }
// Include the compact mixin for items that are always compact
.item.compact { @include compact-mixin; }
// Here's the tricky part, due to how SASS handles extending
.item { ... }
// The following needs to be declared AFTER .item, else it'll
// be overridden by .item's NORMAL styles.
@media (max-width: 600px) {
%compact { @include compact-mixin; }
// Afterwards we can extend and
// customize different item compact styles
.item {
@extend %compact;
/* Other styles that override %compact */
}
// As shown below, we can extend the compact styles as many
// times as we want without needing to re-extend
// the compact mixin, thus avoiding generating duplicate css
.item-alt {
@extend %compact;
}
}
This is the cleanest, partial solution I've found. It takes advantage of @extend where possible and falls back to mixins when inside media queries.
Cross-Media Query @extend Directives in Sass
See the article for full details but the gist is that you call a mixin 'placeholder' that then decides whether to output @extend or an @include.
@include placeholder('clear') {
clear: both;
overflow: hidden;
}
.a {
@include _(clear);
}
.b {
@include _(clear);
}
.c {
@include breakpoint(medium) {
@include _(clear);
}
}
Ultimately it may not be better than just using mixins, which is currently the accepted answer.
I believe SASS/SCSS does not support the @extend
directive inside of a media query. http://designshack.net/articles/css/sass-and-media-queries-what-you-can-and-cant-do/
You might need to use a mixin instead, though the code bloat needs to be weighed against your objective.
The simple answer is: you can't because Sass can't (or won't) compose the selector for it. You can't be inside of a media query and extend something that's outside of a media query. It certainly would be nice if it would simply take a copy of it instead of trying to compose the selectors. But it doesn't so you can't.
If you have a case where you're going to be reusing a block of code inside and outside of media queries and still want it to be able to extend it, then write both a mixin and an extend class:
@mixin foo {
// do stuff
}
%foo {
@include foo;
}
// usage
.foo {
@extend %foo;
}
@media (min-width: 30em) {
.bar {
@include foo;
}
}
This won't really help your use case, but it is another option:
%foo {
@media (min-width: 20em) {
color: red;
}
}
@media (min-width: 30em) {
%bar {
background: yellow;
}
}
// usage
.foo {
@extend %foo;
}
.bar {
@extend %bar;
}
There are a number of ongoing discussions regarding this issue (please don't contribute to these threads unless you have something meaningful to add: the maintainers are already aware that users desire this functionality, it's just a question of how to implement it and what the syntax should be).
I use breakpoints, but it's the same idea:
@mixin bp-small {
@media only screen and (max-width: 30em) {
@content;
}
How to use it:
.sidebar {
width: 60%;
float: left;
@include bp-small {
width: 100%;
float: none;
}
}
There is a text about mixins where you can find out more about this option.
Could you restructure?
.compact { //compact-styles }
.item {}
.item.compact { @extend .compact }
@media (max-width: 600px) {
.item { @extend .compact; }
}
If I understand the documentation correctly, that should work. I think the reason the way you're trying won't work is that it doesn't see .item.compact when it's parsing the @extend, but that's an uninformed guess, so take that with a truck load of salt! :)