I am using Play Framework 1.2.4 with PostgreSQL
and JPA
. I would like to have a Model hierarchy and see that there are some alternatives to doing t
As I explained in this article, @MappedSupperclass
is different than the @Inheritance
annotation.
@MappedSuperclass
tells the JPA provider to include the base class persistent properties as if they were declared by the child class extending the superclass annotated with @MappedSuperclass
.
However, the inheritance is only visible in the OOP world, since, from a database perspective, there's no indication of the base class. Only the child class entity will have an associated mapped table.
The @Inheritance
annotation is meant to materialize the OOP inheritance model in the database table structure. More, you can query a base class annotated with @Inheritance
but you can't do that for a base class annotated with @MappedSuperclass
.
Now, the reason why you'd want to use the @Inheritance JPA annotation is to implement behavior-driven patterns like the Strategy Pattern.
On the other hand, @MappedSuperclass
is just a way to reuse both basic properties, associations, and even the entity @Id
using a common base class. Nevertheless, you can achieve almost the same goal using an @Embeddable
type. The only major difference is that you can't reuse an @Id
definition with @Embeddable
, but you can do it with @MappedSuperclass
.
MappedSuperClass must be used to inherit properties, associations, and methods.
Entity inheritance must be used when you have an entity, and several sub-entities.
You can tell if you need one or the other by answering this questions: is there some other entity in the model which could have an association with the base class?
If yes, then the base class is in fact an entity, and you should use entity inheritance. If no, then the base class is in fact a class that contains attributes and methods that are common to several unrelated entities, and you should use a mapped superclass.
For example: