Since now, I\'m using this loop to iterate over the elements of an array, which works fine even if I put objects with various properties inside of it.
var cu
var cubes = [["string", "string"], ["string", "string"]];
for(var i = 0; i < cubes.length; i++) {
for(var j = 0; j < cubes[i].length; j++) {
console.log(cubes[i][j]);
}
}
If you're using ES2015 and you want to define your own object that iterates like a 2-D array, you can implement the iterator protocol by:
Symbol.iterator
which returns...next()
function that returns...value
with the next value (if there is one) and a boolean done
which is true if we're done iterating.A one-dimensional array iterator function would look like this:
// our custom Cubes object which implements the iterable protocol
function Cubes() {
this.cubes = [1, 2, 3, 4];
this.numVals = this.cubes.length;
// assign a function to the property Symbol.iterator
// which is a special property that the spread operator
// and for..of construct both search for
this[Symbol.iterator] = function () { // can't take args
var index = -1; // keep an internal count of our index
var self = this; // access vars/methods in object scope
// the @@iterator method must return an object
// with a "next()" property, which will be called
// implicitly to get the next value
return {
// next() must return an object with a "done"
// (and optionally also a "value") property
next: function() {
index++;
// if there's still some values, return next one
if (index < self.numVals) {
return {
value: self.cubes[index],
done: false
};
}
// else there's no more values left, so we're done
// IF YOU FORGET THIS YOU WILL LOOP FOREVER!
return {done: true}
}
};
};
}
Now, we can treat our Cubes
object like an iterable:
var cube = new Cubes(); // construct our cube object
// both call Symbol.iterator function implicitly:
console.log([...cube]); // spread operator
for (var value of cube) { // for..of construct
console.log(value);
}
To create our own 2-D iterable, instead of returning a value in our next()
function, we can return another iterable:
function Cubes() {
this.cubes = [
[1, 2, 3, 4],
[5, 6, 7, 8],
[9, 10, 11, 12],
];
this.numRows = this.cubes.length;
this.numCols = this.cubes[0].length; // assumes all rows have same length
this[Symbol.iterator] = function () {
var row = -1;
var self = this;
// create a closure that returns an iterator
// on the captured row index
function createColIterator(currentRow) {
var col = -1;
var colIterator = {}
// column iterator implements iterable protocol
colIterator[Symbol.iterator] = function() {
return {next: function() {
col++;
if (col < self.numCols) {
// return raw value
return {
value: self.cubes[currentRow][col],
done: false
};
}
return {done: true};
}};
}
return colIterator;
}
return {next: function() {
row++;
if (row < self.numRows) {
// instead of a value, return another iterator
return {
value: createColIterator(row),
done: false
};
}
return {done: true}
}};
};
}
Now, we can use nested iteration:
var cube = new Cubes();
// spread operator returns list of iterators,
// each of which can be spread to get values
var rows = [...cube];
console.log([...rows[0]]);
console.log([...rows[1]]);
console.log([...rows[2]]);
// use map to apply spread operator to each iterable
console.log([...cube].map(function(iterator) {
return [...iterator];
}));
for (var row of cube) {
for (var value of row) {
console.log(value);
}
}
Note that our custom iterable won't behave like a 2-D array in all cases; for example, we haven't implemented a map()
function. This answer shows how you could implement a generator map function (see here for the difference between iterators and generators; also, generators are an ES2016 feature, not ES2015, so you'll need to change your babel presets if you're compiling with babel).