“If constexpr” in C++17 does not work in a non-templated function

前端 未结 3 1199
别跟我提以往
别跟我提以往 2020-11-28 13:48

I tried to play with the C++17 standard. I tried to use one of the features of C++17 if constexpr. And I had a problem... Please take a look at the following co

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-11-28 14:07

    I would like to know why "if constexpr" works only in template functions, even if the type is deduced by the decltype from the input parameter.

    This is by design.

    if constexpr will not instantiate the branch not taken if it's within a template. It won't just treat the branch not taken as token soup and avoid parsing it or performing semantic analysis entirely. Both sides are still going to be analyzed, and since *value is ill-formed for ints, that's an error.

    You simply can't use if constexpr to avoid compiling non-template code. It's only to avoid instantiating template code that's potentially invalid-for-the-particular-specialization.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-28 14:15

    Outside a template, a discarded statement is fully checked. if constexpr is not a substitute for the #if preprocessing directive.

    here

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-28 14:17

    C++ standard, clause 9.4.1:

    If the if statement is of the form if constexpr, the value of the condition shall be a contextually converted constant expression of type bool (8.6); this form is called a constexpr if statement. If the value of the converted condition is false, the first substatement is a discarded statement, otherwise the second substatement, if present, is a discarded statement. During the instantiation of an enclosing templated entity (Clause 17), if the condition is not value-dependent after its instantiation, the discarded substatement (if any) is not instantiated.

    (emphasis mine)

    So, a substatement of a constexpr if still gets instantiated if it is not inside a template, thus it must at least compile.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题