Would like to hear experts on best practice of editing JPA entities from JSF UI.
So, a couple of words about the problem.
Imagine I have the persisted object
Lazy Loading is an important feature that can boost performance nicely. However the usability of this is way worse than it should be.
Especially when you start to deal with AJAX-Requests, encountering uninitialized collections, the Annotation ist just usefull to tell Hibernate don't load this right away. Hibernate is not taking care of anything else, but will throw a LazyInitializationException
at you - as you experienced.
My solution to this - which might be not perfect or a nightmare over all - works in any scenario, by applying the following rules (I have to admit, that this was written at the very beginning, but works ever since):
Every Entity that is using fetch = FetchType.LAZY
has to extend LazyEntity
, and call initializeCollection()
in the getter of the collection
in question, before it is returned. (A custom validator is taking care of this constraints, reporting missing extensions and/or calls to initializeCollection
)
Example-Class (User, which has groups loaded lazy):
public class User extends LazyEntity{
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "user", fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
@BatchSize(size = 5)
List<Group> groups;
public List<Group> getGroups(){
initializeCollection(this.groups);
return this.groups;
}
}
Where the implementation of initializeCollection(Collection collection)
looks like the following. The In-Line comments should give you an idea of what is required for which scenario. The method is synchronized to avoid 2 active sessions transfering ownership of an entity while another session is currently fetching data. (Only appears when concurrent Ajax-Requests are going on on the same instance.)
public abstract class LazyEntity {
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
protected synchronized void initializeCollection(Collection collection) {
if (collection instanceof AbstractPersistentCollection) {
//Already loaded?
if (!Hibernate.isInitialized(collection)) {
AbstractPersistentCollection ps = (AbstractPersistentCollection) collection;
//Is current Session closed? Then this is an ajax call, need new session!
//Else, Hibernate will know what to do.
if (ps.getSession() == null) {
//get an OPEN em. This needs to be handled according to your application.
EntityManager em = ContextHelper.getBean(ServiceProvider.class).getEntityManager();
//get any Session to obtain SessionFactory
Session anySession = em.unwrap(Session.class);
SessionFactory sf = anySession.getSessionFactory();
//get a new session
Session newSession = sf.openSession();
//move "this" to the new session.
newSession.update(this);
//let hibernate do its work on the current session.
Hibernate.initialize(collection);
//done, we can abandon the "new Session".
newSession.close();
}
}
}
}
}
But be aware, that this approach needs you to validate IF an Entity is associated to the CURRENT session, whenever you save it - else you have to move the whole Object-Tree to the current session again before calling merge()
.
A very common approach is to create an open entity manager in view filter. Spring provides one (check here).
I can't see that you're using Spring, but that's not really a problem, you can adapt the code in that class for your needs. You can also check the filter Open Session in View, which does the same, but it keeps a hibernate session open rather than an Entity Manager.
This approach might not be good for your application, there're a few discussions in SO about this pattern or antipattern. Link1. I think that for most applications (smalish, less than 20 concurrent users) this solution works just fine.
There's a Spring class ties better with FSF here
For Hibernate >= 4.1.6 read this https://stackoverflow.com/a/11913404/3252285
Using the OpenSessionInView Filter (Design pattern) is very usefull, but in my opinion it dosn't solve the problem completely, here's why :
If we have an Entity stored in Session or handled by a Session Bean or retrieved from the cache, and one of its collections has not been initialized during the same loading request, then we could get the Exception at any time we call it later, even if we use the OSIV desing pattern.
Lets detail the problem:
Listener or Handler
) to reatach the proxy in case his session is closed or he's detached from its own session.Why hibernate dosn't offer that ? : because its not easy to identify to which Session, the Proxy should be reatached, but in many cases we could.
So how to reattach the proxy when the LazyInitializationException happens ?.
In my ERP, i modify thoses Classes : JavassistLazyInitializer
and AbstractPersistentCollection
, then i never care about this Exception any more (used since 3 years without any bug) :
class JavassistLazyInitializer{
@Override
public Object invoke(
final Object proxy,
final Method thisMethod,
final Method proceed,
final Object[] args) throws Throwable {
if ( this.constructed ) {
Object result;
try {
result = this.invoke( thisMethod, args, proxy );
}
catch ( Throwable t ) {
throw new Exception( t.getCause() );
}
if ( result == INVOKE_IMPLEMENTATION ) {
Object target = null;
try{
target = getImplementation();
}catch ( LazyInitializationException lze ) {
/* Catching the LazyInitException and reatach the proxy to the right Session */
EntityManager em = ContextConfig.getCurrent().getDAO(
BaseBean.getWcx(),
HibernateProxyHelper.getClassWithoutInitializingProxy(proxy)).
getEm();
((Session)em.getDelegate()).refresh(proxy);// attaching the proxy
}
try{
if (target==null)
target = getImplementation();
.....
}
....
}
and the
class AbstractPersistentCollection{
private <T> T withTemporarySessionIfNeeded(LazyInitializationWork<T> lazyInitializationWork) {
SessionImplementor originalSession = null;
boolean isTempSession = false;
boolean isJTA = false;
if ( session == null ) {
if ( allowLoadOutsideTransaction ) {
session = openTemporarySessionForLoading();
isTempSession = true;
}
else {
/* Let try to reatach the proxy to the right Session */
try{
session = ((SessionImplementor)ContextConfig.getCurrent().getDAO(
BaseBean.getWcx(), HibernateProxyHelper.getClassWithoutInitializingProxy(
owner)).getEm().getDelegate());
SessionFactoryImplementor impl = (SessionFactoryImplementor) ((SessionImpl)session).getSessionFactory();
((SessionImpl)session).getPersistenceContext().addUninitializedDetachedCollection(
impl.getCollectionPersister(role), this);
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
if (session==null)
throwLazyInitializationException( "could not initialize proxy - no Session" );
}
}
if (session==null)
throwLazyInitializationException( "could not initialize proxy - no Session" );
....
}
...
}
NB :
There is no standard support for open session in view in EJB3, see this answer.
The fetch type of mappings is just a default option, i can be overriden at query time. This is an example:
select g from Group g fetch join g.students
So an alternative in plain EJB3 is to make sure that all the data necessary for rendering the view is loaded before the render starts, by explicitly querying for the needed data.
Open Session in View design pattern can be easy implemented in Java EE environment (with no dependency to hibernate, spring or something else out side Java EE). It is mostly the same as in OpenSessionInView, but instead of Hibernate session you should use JTA transaction
@WebFilter(urlPatterns = {"*"})
public class JTAFilter implements Filter{
@Resource
private UserTransaction ut;
@Override
public void init(FilterConfig filterConfig) throws ServletException {
}
@Override
public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain) throws IOException, ServletException {
try{
ut.begin();
chain.doFilter(request, response);
}catch(NotSupportedException | SystemException e){
throw new ServletException("", e);
} finally {
try {
if(ut.getStatus()!= Status.STATUS_MARKED_ROLLBACK){
ut.commit();
}
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new ServletException("", e);
}
}
}
@Override
public void destroy() {
}
}
You should provide exactly the model the view expects.
If the JPA entity happens to match exactly the needed model, then just use it right away.
If the JPA entity happens to have too few or too much properties, then use a DTO (subclass) and/or a constructor expression with a more specific JPQL query, if necessary with an explicit FETCH JOIN. Or perhaps with Hibernate specific fetch profiles, or EclipseLink specific attribute groups. Otherwise, it may either cause lazy initializtion exceptions over all place, or consume more memory than necessary.
The "open session in view" pattern is a poor design. You're basically keeping a single DB transaction open during the entire HTTP request-response processing. Control over whether to start a new DB transaction or not is completely taken away from you. You cannot spawn multiple transactions during the same HTTP request when the business logic requires so. Keep in mind that when a single query fails during a transaction, then the entire transaction is rolled back. See also When is it necessary or convenient to use Spring or EJB3 or all of them together?
In JSF perspective, the "open session in view" pattern also implies that it's possible to perform business logic while rendering the response. This doesn't go very well together with among others exception handling whereby the intent is to show a custom error page to the enduser. If a business exception is thrown halfway rendering the response, whereby the enduser has thus already received the response headers and a part of the HTML, then the server cannot clear out the response anymore in order to show a nice error page. Also, performing business logic in getter methods is a frowned upon practice in JSF as per Why JSF calls getters multiple times.
Just prepare exactly the model the view needs via usual service method calls in managed bean action/listener methods, before render response phase starts. For example, a common situation is having an existing (unmanaged) parent entity at hands with a lazy loaded one-to-many children property, and you'd like to render it in the current view via an ajax action, then you should just let the ajax listener method fetch and initialize it in the service layer.
<f:ajax listener="#{bean.showLazyChildren(parent)}" render="children" />
public void showLazyChildren(Parent parent) {
someParentService.fetchLazyChildren(parent);
}
public void fetchLazyChildren(Parent parent) {
parent.setLazyChildren(em.merge(parent).getLazyChildren()); // Becomes managed.
parent.getLazyChildren().size(); // Triggers lazy initialization.
}
Specifically in JSF UISelectMany
components, there's another, completely unexpected, probable cause for a LazyInitializationException
: during saving the selected items, JSF needs to recreate the underlying collection before filling it with the selected items, however if it happens to be a persistence layer specific lazy loaded collection implementation, then this exception will also be thrown. The solution is to explicitly set the collectionType
attribute of the UISelectMany
component to the desired "plain" type.
<h:selectManyCheckbox ... collectionType="java.util.ArrayList">
This is in detail asked and answered in org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException at com.sun.faces.renderkit.html_basic.MenuRenderer.convertSelectManyValuesForModel.