I wish to search a database table on a nullable column. Sometimes the value I\'m search for is itself NULL. Since Null is equal to nothing, even NULL, saying
@Andy Lester asserts that the original form of the query is more efficient than using NVL. I decided to test that assertion:
SQL> DECLARE
2 CURSOR B IS
3 SELECT batch_id, equipment_id
4 FROM batch;
5 v_t1 NUMBER;
6 v_t2 NUMBER;
7 v_c1 NUMBER;
8 v_c2 NUMBER;
9 v_b INTEGER;
10 BEGIN
11 -- Form 1 of the where clause
12 v_t1 := dbms_utility.get_time;
13 v_c1 := dbms_utility.get_cpu_time;
14 FOR R IN B LOOP
15 SELECT COUNT(*)
16 INTO v_b
17 FROM batch
18 WHERE equipment_id = R.equipment_id OR (equipment_id IS NULL AND R.equipment_id IS NULL);
19 END LOOP;
20 v_t2 := dbms_utility.get_time;
21 v_c2 := dbms_utility.get_cpu_time;
22 dbms_output.put_line('For clause: WHERE equipment_id = R.equipment_id OR (equipment_id IS NULL AND R.equipment_id IS NULL)');
23 dbms_output.put_line('CPU seconds used: '||(v_c2 - v_c1)/100);
24 dbms_output.put_line('Elapsed time: '||(v_t2 - v_t1)/100);
25
26 -- Form 2 of the where clause
27 v_t1 := dbms_utility.get_time;
28 v_c1 := dbms_utility.get_cpu_time;
29 FOR R IN B LOOP
30 SELECT COUNT(*)
31 INTO v_b
32 FROM batch
33 WHERE NVL(equipment_id,'xxxx') = NVL(R.equipment_id,'xxxx');
34 END LOOP;
35 v_t2 := dbms_utility.get_time;
36 v_c2 := dbms_utility.get_cpu_time;
37 dbms_output.put_line('For clause: WHERE NVL(equipment_id,''xxxx'') = NVL(R.equipment_id,''xxxx'')');
38 dbms_output.put_line('CPU seconds used: '||(v_c2 - v_c1)/100);
39 dbms_output.put_line('Elapsed time: '||(v_t2 - v_t1)/100);
40 END;
41 /
For clause: WHERE equipment_id = R.equipment_id OR (equipment_id IS NULL AND R.equipment_id IS NULL)
CPU seconds used: 84.69
Elapsed time: 84.8
For clause: WHERE NVL(equipment_id,'xxxx') = NVL(R.equipment_id,'xxxx')
CPU seconds used: 124
Elapsed time: 124.01
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed
SQL> select count(*) from batch;
COUNT(*)
----------
20903
SQL>
I was kind of surprised to find out just how correct Andy is. It costs nearly 50% more to do the NVL solution. So, even though one piece of code might not look as tidy or elegant as another, it could be significantly more efficient. I ran this procedure multiple times, and the results were nearly the same each time. Kudos to Andy...
Use NVL to replace null with some dummy value on both sides, as in:
WHERE NVL(MYCOLUMN,0) = NVL(SEARCHVALUE,0)
This is a situation we find ourselves in a lot with our Oracle functions that drive reports. We want to allow users to enter a value to restrict results or leave it blank to return all records. This is what I have used and it has worked well for us.
WHERE rte_pending.ltr_rte_id = prte_id
OR ((rte_pending.ltr_rte_id IS NULL OR rte_pending.ltr_rte_id IS NOT NULL)
AND prte_id IS NULL)
I don't know if it's simpler, but I've occasionally used
WHERE ISNULL(MyColumn, -1) = ISNULL(SearchValue, -1)
Replacing "-1" with some value that is valid for the column type but also not likely to be actually found in the data.
NOTE: I use MS SQL, not Oracle, so not sure if "ISNULL" is valid.
I would think that what you have is OK. You could maybe use:
where NVL(MYCOLUMN, '') = NVL(SEARCHVALUE, '')