Skipping Incompatible Libraries at compile

Question

When I try to compile a copy of my project on my local machine, I get an error stating that it \'s skipping over incompatible libraries. This isn\'t the case when I\'m mess

Answer 1

Normally, that is not an error per se; it is a warning that the first file it found that matches the -lPI-Http argument to the compiler/linker is not valid. The error occurs when no other library can be found with the right content.

So, you need to look to see whether /dvlpmnt/libPI-Http.a is a library of 32-bit object files or of 64-bit object files - it will likely be 64-bit if you are compiling with the -m32 option. Then you need to establish whether there is an alternative libPI-Http.a or libPI-Http.so file somewhere else that is 32-bit. If so, ensure that the directory that contains it is listed in a -L/some/where argument to the linker. If not, then you will need to obtain or build a 32-bit version of the library from somewhere.

To establish what is in that library, you may need to do:

mkdir junk
cd junk
ar x /dvlpmnt/libPI-Http.a
file *.o
cd ..
rm -fr junk

The 'file' step tells you what type of object files are in the archive. The rest just makes sure you don't make a mess that can't be easily cleaned up.

Answer 2

That message isn't actually an error - it's just a warning that the file in question isn't of the right architecture (e.g. 32-bit vs 64-bit, wrong CPU architecture). The linker will keep looking for a library of the right type.

Of course, if you're also getting an error along the lines of can't find lPI-Http then you have a problem :-)

It's hard to suggest what the exact remedy will be without knowing the details of your build system and makefiles, but here are a couple of shots in the dark:

1. Just to check: usually you would add flags to CFLAGS rather than CTAGS - are you sure this is correct? (What you have may be correct - this will depend on your build system!)
2. Often the flag needs to be passed to the linker too - so you may also need to modify LDFLAGS

If that doesn't help - can you post the full error output, plus the actual command (e.g. gcc foo.c -m32 -Dxxx etc) that was being executed?