I have developed a Spring Data repository, MemberRepository
interface, that extends org.springframework.data.jpa.repository.JpaRepository
. Me
I tried testing the cache behavior in my app using Oliver's example. In my case my cache is set at the service layer and I want to verify that my repo is being called the right number of times. I'm using spock mocks instead of mockito. I spent some time trying to figure out why my tests are failing, until I realized that tests running first are populating the cache and effecting the other tests. After clearing the cache for every test they started behaving as expected.
Here's what I ended up with:
@ContextConfiguration
class FooBarServiceCacheTest extends Specification {
@TestConfiguration
@EnableCaching
static class Config {
def mockFactory = new DetachedMockFactory()
def fooBarRepository = mockFactory.Mock(FooBarRepository)
@Bean
CacheManager cacheManager() {
new ConcurrentMapCacheManager(FOOBARS)
}
@Bean
FooBarRepository fooBarRepository() {
fooBarRepository
}
@Bean
FooBarService getFooBarService() {
new FooBarService(fooBarRepository)
}
}
@Autowired
@Subject
FooBarService fooBarService
@Autowired
FooBarRepository fooBarRepository
@Autowired
CacheManager cacheManager
def "setup"(){
// we want to start each test with an new cache
cacheManager.getCache(FOOBARS).clear()
}
def "should return cached foobars "() {
given:
final foobars = [new FooBar(), new FooBar()]
when:
fooBarService.getFooBars()
fooBarService.getFooBars()
final fooBars = fooBarService.getFooBars()
then:
1 * fooBarRepository.findAll() >> foobars
}
def "should return new foobars after clearing cache"() {
given:
final foobars = [new FooBar(), new FooBar()]
when:
fooBarService.getFooBars()
fooBarService.clearCache()
final fooBars = fooBarService.getFooBars()
then:
2 * fooBarRepository.findAll() >> foobars
}
}
If you want to test a technical aspect like caching, don't use a database at all. It's important to understand what you'd like to test here. You want to make sure the method invocation is avoided for the invocation with the very same arguments. The repository fronting a database is a completely orthogonal aspect to this topic.
Here's what I'd recommend:
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration
public class CachingIntegrationTest {
// Your repository interface
interface MyRepo extends Repository<Object, Long> {
@Cacheable("sample")
Object findByEmail(String email);
}
@Configuration
@EnableCaching
static class Config {
// Simulating your caching configuration
@Bean
CacheManager cacheManager() {
return new ConcurrentMapCacheManager("sample");
}
// A repository mock instead of the real proxy
@Bean
MyRepo myRepo() {
return Mockito.mock(MyRepo.class);
}
}
@Autowired CacheManager manager;
@Autowired MyRepo repo;
@Test
public void methodInvocationShouldBeCached() {
Object first = new Object();
Object second = new Object();
// Set up the mock to return *different* objects for the first and second call
Mockito.when(repo.findByEmail(Mockito.any(String.class))).thenReturn(first, second);
// First invocation returns object returned by the method
Object result = repo.findByEmail("foo");
assertThat(result, is(first));
// Second invocation should return cached value, *not* second (as set up above)
result = repo.findByEmail("foo");
assertThat(result, is(first));
// Verify repository method was invoked once
Mockito.verify(repo, Mockito.times(1)).findByEmail("foo");
assertThat(manager.getCache("sample").get("foo"), is(notNullValue()));
// Third invocation with different key is triggers the second invocation of the repo method
result = repo.findByEmail("bar");
assertThat(result, is(second));
}
}
As you can see, we do a bit of over-testing here: