I\'ve got an interface with some async functions. Some of the classes that implements the interface does not have anything to await, and some might just throw. It\'s a b
You might try this:
public async Task<object> test()
{
await Task.CompletedTask;
}
There is difference between solutions and strictly speaking you should know how caller is going to call the async method, but with default usage pattern that assumes ".Wait()" on method result - "return Task.CompletedTask" is the best solution.
BenchmarkDotNet=v0.10.11, OS=Windows 10 Redstone 3 [1709, Fall Creators Update] (10.0.16299.192)
Processor=Intel Core i5-2500K CPU 3.30GHz (Sandy Bridge), ProcessorCount=4
Frequency=3233537 Hz, Resolution=309.2589 ns, Timer=TSC
.NET Core SDK=2.1.2
[Host] : .NET Core 2.0.3 (Framework 4.6.25815.02), 64bit RyuJIT
Clr : .NET Framework 4.7 (CLR 4.0.30319.42000), 64bit RyuJIT-v4.7.2600.0
Core : .NET Core 2.0.3 (Framework 4.6.25815.02), 64bit RyuJIT
Method | Job | Runtime | Mean | Error | StdDev | Median | Min | Max | Rank | Gen 0 | Gen 1 | Gen 2 | Allocated |
--------------- |----- |-------- |-------------:|------------:|------------:|-------------:|-------------:|-------------:|-----:|-------:|-------:|-------:|----------:|
CompletedAwait | Clr | Clr | 95.253 ns | 0.7491 ns | 0.6641 ns | 95.100 ns | 94.461 ns | 96.557 ns | 7 | 0.0075 | - | - | 24 B |
Completed | Clr | Clr | 12.036 ns | 0.0659 ns | 0.0617 ns | 12.026 ns | 11.931 ns | 12.154 ns | 2 | 0.0076 | - | - | 24 B |
Pragma | Clr | Clr | 87.868 ns | 0.3923 ns | 0.3670 ns | 87.789 ns | 87.336 ns | 88.683 ns | 6 | 0.0075 | - | - | 24 B |
FromResult | Clr | Clr | 107.009 ns | 0.6671 ns | 0.6240 ns | 107.009 ns | 106.204 ns | 108.247 ns | 8 | 0.0584 | - | - | 184 B |
Yield | Clr | Clr | 1,766.843 ns | 26.5216 ns | 24.8083 ns | 1,770.383 ns | 1,705.386 ns | 1,800.653 ns | 9 | 0.0877 | 0.0038 | 0.0019 | 320 B |
CompletedAwait | Core | Core | 37.201 ns | 0.1961 ns | 0.1739 ns | 37.227 ns | 36.970 ns | 37.559 ns | 4 | 0.0076 | - | - | 24 B |
Completed | Core | Core | 9.017 ns | 0.0690 ns | 0.0577 ns | 9.010 ns | 8.925 ns | 9.128 ns | 1 | 0.0076 | - | - | 24 B |
Pragma | Core | Core | 34.118 ns | 0.4576 ns | 0.4281 ns | 34.259 ns | 33.437 ns | 34.792 ns | 3 | 0.0076 | - | - | 24 B |
FromResult | Core | Core | 46.953 ns | 1.2728 ns | 1.1905 ns | 46.467 ns | 45.674 ns | 49.868 ns | 5 | 0.0533 | - | - | 168 B |
Yield | Core | Core | 2,480.980 ns | 199.4416 ns | 575.4347 ns | 2,291.978 ns | 1,810.644 ns | 4,085.196 ns | 10 | 0.0916 | - | - | 296 B |
Note: FromResult
can't be directly compared.
Test Code:
[RankColumn, MinColumn, MaxColumn, StdDevColumn, MedianColumn]
[ClrJob, CoreJob]
[HtmlExporter, MarkdownExporter]
[MemoryDiagnoser]
public class BenchmarkAsyncNotAwaitInterface
{
string context = "text context";
[Benchmark]
public int CompletedAwait()
{
var t = new CompletedAwaitTest();
var a = t.DoAsync(context);
a.Wait();
return t.Length;
}
[Benchmark]
public int Completed()
{
var t = new CompletedTest();
var a = t.DoAsync(context);
a.Wait();
return t.Length;
}
[Benchmark]
public int Pragma()
{
var t = new PragmaTest();
var a = t.DoAsync(context);
a.Wait();
return t.Length;
}
[Benchmark]
public int Yield()
{
var t = new YieldTest();
var a = t.DoAsync(context);
a.Wait();
return t.Length;
}
[Benchmark]
public int FromResult()
{
var t = new FromResultTest();
var t2 = t.DoAsync(context);
return t2.Result;
}
public interface ITestInterface
{
int Length { get; }
Task DoAsync(string context);
}
class CompletedAwaitTest : ITestInterface
{
public int Length { get; private set; }
public async Task DoAsync(string context)
{
Length = context.Length;
await Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
class CompletedTest : ITestInterface
{
public int Length { get; private set; }
public Task DoAsync(string context)
{
Length = context.Length;
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
class PragmaTest : ITestInterface
{
public int Length { get; private set; }
#pragma warning disable 1998
public async Task DoAsync(string context)
{
Length = context.Length;
return;
}
#pragma warning restore 1998
}
class YieldTest : ITestInterface
{
public int Length { get; private set; }
public async Task DoAsync(string context)
{
Length = context.Length;
await Task.Yield();
}
}
public interface ITestInterface2
{
Task<int> DoAsync(string context);
}
class FromResultTest : ITestInterface2
{
public async Task<int> DoAsync(string context)
{
var i = context.Length;
return await Task.FromResult(i);
}
}
}
// This is to get rid of warning CS1998, please remove when implementing this method.
await new Task(() => { }).ConfigureAwait(false);
throw new NotImplementedException();
Another option, if you want to keep the body of the function simple and not write code to support it, is simply to suppress the warning with #pragma:
#pragma warning disable 1998
public async Task<object> Test()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
#pragma warning restore 1998
If this is common enough, you could put the disable statement at the top of the file and omit the restore.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/441722ys(v=vs.110).aspx
Just as an update to Stephen's Answer, you no longer need to write the TaskConstants
class as there is a new helper method:
public Task ThrowException()
{
try
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
return Task.FromException(e);
}
}
In case you already link against Reactive Extension, you can also do:
public async Task<object> NotImplemented()
{
await Observable.Throw(new NotImplementedException(), null as object).ToTask();
}
public async Task<object> SimpleResult()
{
await Observable.Return(myvalue).ToTask();
}
Reactive and async/await are both amazing in and by themselves, but they also play well together.
Includes needed are:
using System.Reactive.Linq;
using System.Reactive.Threading.Tasks;