I\'m looking for help using sum() in my SQL query:
SELECT links.id,
count(DISTINCT stats.id) as clicks,
count(DISTINCT conversions.id) as con
I may be wrong but from what I understand
Thus for each conversions.id you have at most one links.id impacted.
You request is a bit like doing the cartesian product of 2 sets :
[clicks]
SELECT *
FROM links
LEFT OUTER JOIN stats ON links.id = stats.parent_id
[conversions]
SELECT *
FROM links
LEFT OUTER JOIN conversions ON links.id = conversions.link_id
and for each link, you get sizeof([clicks]) x sizeof([conversions]) lines
As you noted the number of unique conversions in your request can be obtained via a
count(distinct conversions.id) = sizeof([conversions])
this distinct manages to remove all the [clicks] lines in the cartesian product
but clearly
sum(conversions.value) = sum([conversions].value) * sizeof([clicks])
In your case, since
count(*) = sizeof([clicks]) x sizeof([conversions])
count(*) = sizeof([clicks]) x count(distinct conversions.id)
you have
sizeof([clicks]) = count(*)/count(distinct conversions.id)
so I would test your request with
SELECT links.id,
count(DISTINCT stats.id) as clicks,
count(DISTINCT conversions.id) as conversions,
sum(conversions.value)*count(DISTINCT conversions.id)/count(*) as conversion_value
FROM links
LEFT OUTER JOIN stats ON links.id = stats.parent_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN conversions ON links.id = conversions.link_id
GROUP BY links.id
ORDER BY links.created desc;
Keep me posted ! Jerome
For an explanation of why you were seeing incorrect numbers, read this.
I think that Jerome has a handle on what is causing your error. Bryson's query would work, though having that subquery in the SELECT could be inefficient.