Use of “this” keyword in C++ [duplicate]

Answer 1

For the example case above, it is usually omitted, yes. However, either way is syntactically correct.

Answer 2

Yes. unless, there is an ambiguity.

Answer 3

Yes, it is not required and is usually omitted. It might be required for accessing variables after they have been overridden in the scope though:

Person::Person() {
    int age;
    this->age = 1;
}

Also, this:

Person::Person(int _age) {
    age = _age;
}

It is pretty bad style; if you need an initializer with the same name use this notation:

Person::Person(int age) : age(age) {}

More info here: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/initializer_list

Answer 4

this points to the object in whose member function it is reffered, so it is optional.

Answer 5

Either way works, but many places have coding standards in place that will guide the developer one way or the other. If such a policy is not in place, just follow your heart. One thing, though, it REALLY helps the readability of the code if you do use it. especially if you are not following a naming convention on class-level variable names.

Answer 6

It's programmer preference. Personally, I love using this since it explicitly marks the object members. Of course the _ does the same thing (only when you follow the convention)