To get number of rows in result set there are two ways:
Is to use query to get count
$query=\"Select count(*) as count from some_table where type=
num_rows()
would be better if you have small quantity of rows and count(*)
will give you performance if there are large number of rows and you have to select one and send it to php.
It depends on your implementation. If you're dealing with a lot of rows, count(*) is better because it doesn't have to pass all of those rows to PHP. If, on the other hand, you're dealing with a small amount of rows, the difference is negligible.
count is much more efficient both performance wise and memory wise as you're not having to retrieve so much data from the database server. If you count by a single column such as a unique id then you can get it a little more efficient
If your goal is to actually count the rows, use COUNT(*)
. num_rows
is ordinarily (in my experience) only used to confirm that more than zero rows were returned and continue on in that case. It will probably take MySQL longer to read out many selected rows compared to the aggregation on COUNT
too even if the query itself takes the same amount of time.
There are a few differences between the two:
num_rows
is the number of result rows (records) received.count(*)
is the number of records in the database matching the query.The database may be configured to limit the number of returned results (MySQL allows this for instance), in which case the two may differ in value if the limit is lower than the number of matching records. Note that limits may be configured by the DBA, so it may not be obvious from the SQL query code itself what limits apply.
Using num_rows
to count records implies "transmitting" each record, so if you only want a total number (which would be a single record/row) you are far better off getting the count
instead.
Additionally count
can be used in more complex query scenario's to do things like sub-totals, which is not easily done with num_rows
.