Given
What you've really done here is something like this:
https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/5/
var notRejectedPromise =
Promise.reject("b")
.then((resolved) => resolved, (err) => err)
var promises = [Promise.resolve("a"), notRejectedPromise];
Promise.all(promises)
.then(function(complete) {
console.log("all promises after .map()", complete)
}, function(err) {
console.log("err", err)
})
But deciding to handle the err portion by returning whatever err
was, you returned a string. This is not a reason for rejection.
To actually cause the Promise.all()
to reject you need an error to occur in either the resolved
or rejected
portion of .then
Given this, if you return a rejected promise, it will reject:
https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/3/
console.log(err)
to
return Promise.reject(err)
Alternatively you can throw an error: https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/2/
console.log(err)
to
throw new Error(err)
You need to understand that handling a rejection results in putting the promise back on the success path. One approach to this is to re-throw in the failure handler, like this:
var promises = [Promise.resolve("a"), Promise.reject("b")];
Promise.all(promises.map(function(p, index) {
return p.then(function(data) {
console.log("inside .map()", data, "index", index)
return data
}, function(err) {
console.log(err);
// RE-THROW!!
throw err;
})
}))
.then(...
If the purpose of the rejection handler is merely to log, then you could move it out of the chain:
Promise.all(promises.map(function(p, index) {
// MOVE ERROR HANDLER OUTSIDE OF CHAIN
p.catch(function(e) { console.log(e); });
return p.then(function(data) {
console.log("inside .map()", data, "index", index)
return data
})
}))
.then(...