Is it possible to create n number of external tables are pointing to a single hdfs path using Hive. If yes what are the advantages and its limitations.
It is possible to create many tables (both managed and external at the same time) on top of the same location in HDFS.
Creating tables with exactly the same schema on top of the same data is not useful at all, but you can create different tables with different number of columns for example or with differently parsed columns using RegexSerDe for example, so you can have different schemas in these tables. And you can have different permissions on these tables in Hive. Also table can be created on top of the sub-folder of some other tables folder, in this case it will contain a sub-set of data. Better use partitions in single table for the same.
And the drawback is that it is confusing because you can rewrite the same data using more than one table and also you may drop it accidentally, thinking this data belongs to the only table and you can drop data because you do not need that table any more.
And this is few tests:
Create table with INT column:
create table T(id int);
OK
Time taken: 1.033 seconds
Check location and other properties:
hive> describe formatted T;
OK
# col_name data_type comment
id int
# Detailed Table Information
Database: my
Owner: myuser
CreateTime: Fri Jan 04 04:45:03 PST 2019
LastAccessTime: UNKNOWN
Protect Mode: None
Retention: 0
Location: hdfs://myhdp/user/hive/warehouse/my.db/t
Table Type: MANAGED_TABLE
Table Parameters:
transient_lastDdlTime 1546605903
# Storage Information
SerDe Library: org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.lazy.LazySimpleSerDe
InputFormat: org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat
OutputFormat: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveIgnoreKeyTextOutputFormat
Compressed: No
Num Buckets: -1
Bucket Columns: []
Sort Columns: []
Storage Desc Params:
serialization.format 1
Time taken: 0.134 seconds, Fetched: 26 row(s)
sts)
Create second table on top of the same location but with STRING column:
hive> create table T2(id string) location 'hdfs://myhdp/user/hive/warehouse/my.db/t';
OK
Time taken: 0.029 seconds
Insert data:
hive> insert into table T values(1);
OK
Time taken: 33.266 seconds
Check data:
hive> select * from T;
OK
1
Time taken: 3.314 seconds, Fetched: 1 row(s)
Insert into second table:
hive> insert into table T2 values( 'A');
OK
Time taken: 23.959 seconds
Check data:
hive> select * from T2;
OK
1
A
Time taken: 0.073 seconds, Fetched: 2 row(s)
Select from first table:
hive> select * from T;
OK
1
NULL
Time taken: 0.079 seconds, Fetched: 2 row(s)
String was selected as NULL because this table is defined as having INT column.
And now insert STRING into first table (INT column):
insert into table T values( 'A');
OK
Time taken: 84.336 seconds
Surprise, it is not failing!
What was inserted?
hive> select * from T2;
OK
1
A
NULL
Time taken: 0.067 seconds, Fetched: 3 row(s)
NULL was inserted, because during previous insert string was converted to int and this resulted in NULL
Now let's try to drop one table and select from another one:
hive> drop table T;
OK
Time taken: 4.996 seconds
hive> select * from T2;
OK
Time taken: 6.978 seconds
Returned 0 rows because first table was MANAGED and drop table also removed common location.
THE END,
data is removed, do We need T2 table without data in it?
drop table T2;
OK
Second table is removed, you see, it was metadata only. The table was also managed and drop table
should remove the location with data also, but it's already nothing to remove in HDFS, only metadata was removed.