I am running the next test:
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.springframework.bean
The idea of @Configuration
given above works nice. But for that you have to annotate your classes with @Configuration
.
This is not a nice idea when it comes to testing offline i.e when in your organisation test cases are not executed at built time.
In that case going by
@ContextConfiguration(locations = { "classpath:/META-INF/spring/applicationContext.xml" })
will be a nice idea.
For using this method, take care of the following:
Check your classpath in .classpath
file of your project.
If you cannot write the path of applicationContext
relative to classpath.
You can have one more file as applicationContextTest
folder kept in your test case folder and then one can use
@ContextConfiguration(locations = { "classpath:applicationContextTest.xml"})
Try
@ContextConfiguration(locations = { "classpath:/META-INF/spring/applicationContext.xml" })
Honestly I would step away from the xml and go this route. Change
@ContextConfiguration(locations = { "/META-INF/spring/applicationContext.xml" })
to
@ContextConfiguration(classes = { FloorServiceTestConfig.class })
And create the about class
@Configuration
public class FloorServiceTestConfig
{
@Bean
public FloorService floorService()
{
return new FloorService();
}
}
This way when you need to mock your beans for class you're not testing it looks like below
@Configuration
public class FloorServiceTestConfig
{
@Bean
public FloorService floorService()
{
return Mockito.mock(FloorService.class);
}
}
In your case you should use:
@ContextConfiguration(locations = "file:src/main/resources/META-INF/spring/applicationContext.xml")
Another hint, I see that you use your production applicationContext.xml
in your test environment, IMHO it's not a good practice, try use a specific one for testing like applicationContext-test.xml
, so you can play with your test context without hurting your production environment.