Is Parallel.ForEach in ConcurrentBag thread safe

前端 未结 2 2015
失恋的感觉
失恋的感觉 2021-02-20 04:21

Description of ConcurrentBag on MSDN is not clear:

Bags are useful for storing objects when ordering doesn\'t matter, and unlike sets, bags support duplicates. C

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-02-20 05:01

    ConcurrentBag and Parallel.ForEach seems to me, no problem. If you uses this types in scenarios that has a large volume multi-user access, these classes in your implementation could rise up cpu process to levels that can crash your web-server. Furthermore, this implementation starts N tasks (threads) to execute each one of iterations, so be careful when choice this classes ans implementations. I recently spent in this situation and I had to extract memory dump to analyze whats happens into my web application core. So, be careful 'cause Concurrentbag is ThreadSafe and in web scenarios it is no better way.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-20 05:14

    That looks fine to me. The way you're using it is thread-safe.

    If you could return an IEnumerable<XYZ>, it could be made more efficient by not copying to a List<T> when you're done.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题