How to use google test for C++ to run through combinations of data

Question

I have a unit test that I need to run for 200 possible combinations of data. (The production implementation has the data to be tested in configuration files. I know how to mock

Answer 1

You can make use of gtest's Value-parameterized tests for this.

Using this in conjunction with the Combine(g1, g2, ..., gN) generator sounds like your best bet.

The following example populates 2 vectors, one of ints and the other of strings, then with just a single test fixture, creates tests for every combination of available values in the 2 vectors:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <tuple>
#include <vector>
#include "gtest/gtest.h"

std::vector<int> ints;
std::vector<std::string> strings;

class CombinationsTest :
    public ::testing::TestWithParam<std::tuple<int, std::string>> {};

TEST_P(CombinationsTest, Basic) {
  std::cout << "int: "        << std::get<0>(GetParam())
            << "  string: \"" << std::get<1>(GetParam())
            << "\"\n";
}

INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(AllCombinations,
                        CombinationsTest,
                        ::testing::Combine(::testing::ValuesIn(ints),
                                           ::testing::ValuesIn(strings)));

int main(int argc, char **argv) {
  for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
    ints.push_back(i * 100);
    strings.push_back(std::string("String ") + static_cast<char>(i + 65));
  }
  testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
  return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
}

Answer 2

Use an array of structs (called, say, Combination) to hold your test data, and loop though each entry in a single test. Check each combination using EXPECT_EQ instead of ASSERT_EQ so that the test isn't aborted and you can continue checking other combinations.

Overload operator<< for a Combination so that you can output it to an ostream:

ostream& operator<<(ostream& os, const Combination& combo)
{
    os << "(" << combo.field1 << ", " << combo.field2 << ")";
    return os;
}

Overload operator== for a Combination so that you can easily compare two combinations for equality:

bool operator==(const Combination& c1, const Combination& c2)
{
    return (c1.field1 == c2.field1) && (c1.field2 == c2.field2);
}

And the unit test could look something like this:

TEST(myTestCase, myTestName)
{
    int failureCount = 0;
    for (each index i in expectedComboTable)
    {
        Combination expected = expectedComboTable[i];
        Combination actual = generateCombination(i);
        EXPECT_EQ(expected, actual);
        failureCount += (expected == actual) ? 0 : 1;
    }
    ASSERT_EQ(0, failureCount) << "some combinations failed";
}