The Story:
Currently, I have a function-under-test that expects a list of lists of integers with the following rules:
You can also do this with flatmap
, though it's a bit of a contortion.
from hypothesis import strategies as st
from hypothesis import given, settings
number_of_lists = st.integers(min_value=1, max_value=50)
list_lengths = st.integers(min_value=0, max_value=5)
def build_strategy(number_and_length):
number, length = number_and_length
list_elements = st.integers(min_value=0, max_value=number - 1)
return st.lists(
st.lists(list_elements, min_size=length, max_size=length),
min_size=number, max_size=number)
mystrategy = st.tuples(number_of_lists, list_lengths).flatmap(build_strategy)
@settings(max_examples=5000)
@given(mystrategy)
def test_constraints(list_of_lists):
N = len(list_of_lists)
# condition 1
assert 1 <= N <= 50
# Condition 2
[length] = set(map(len, list_of_lists))
assert 0 <= length <= 5
# Condition 3
assert all((0 <= element < N) for lst in list_of_lists for element in lst)
As David mentioned, this does tend to produce a lot of empty lists, so some average size tuning would be required.
>>> mystrategy.example()
[[24, 6, 4, 19], [26, 9, 15, 15], [1, 2, 25, 4], [12, 8, 18, 19], [12, 15, 2, 31], [3, 8, 17, 2], [5, 1, 1, 5], [7, 1, 16, 8], [9, 9, 6, 4], [22, 24, 28, 16], [18, 11, 20, 21], [16, 23, 30, 5], [13, 1, 16, 16], [24, 23, 16, 32], [13, 30, 10, 1], [7, 5, 14, 31], [31, 15, 23, 18], [3, 0, 13, 9], [32, 26, 22, 23], [4, 11, 20, 10], [6, 15, 32, 22], [32, 19, 1, 31], [20, 28, 4, 21], [18, 29, 0, 8], [6, 9, 24, 3], [20, 17, 31, 8], [6, 12, 8, 22], [32, 22, 9, 4], [16, 27, 29, 9], [21, 15, 30, 5], [19, 10, 20, 21], [31, 13, 0, 21], [16, 9, 8, 29]]
>>> mystrategy.example()
[[28, 18], [17, 25], [26, 27], [20, 6], [15, 10], [1, 21], [23, 15], [7, 5], [9, 3], [8, 3], [3, 4], [19, 29], [18, 11], [6, 6], [8, 19], [14, 7], [25, 3], [26, 11], [24, 20], [22, 2], [19, 12], [19, 27], [13, 20], [16, 5], [6, 2], [4, 18], [10, 2], [26, 16], [24, 24], [11, 26]]
>>> mystrategy.example()
[[], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []]
>>> mystrategy.example()
[[], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []]
>>> mystrategy.example()
[[6, 8, 22, 21, 22], [3, 0, 24, 5, 18], [16, 17, 25, 16, 11], [2, 12, 0, 3, 15], [0, 12, 12, 12, 14], [11, 20, 6, 6, 23], [5, 19, 2, 0, 12], [16, 0, 1, 24, 10], [2, 13, 21, 19, 15], [2, 14, 27, 6, 7], [22, 25, 18, 24, 9], [26, 21, 15, 18, 17], [7, 11, 22, 17, 21], [3, 11, 3, 20, 16], [22, 13, 18, 21, 11], [4, 27, 21, 20, 25], [4, 1, 13, 5, 13], [16, 19, 6, 6, 25], [19, 10, 14, 12, 14], [18, 13, 13, 16, 3], [12, 7, 26, 26, 12], [25, 21, 12, 23, 22], [11, 4, 24, 5, 27], [25, 10, 10, 26, 27], [8, 25, 20, 6, 23], [8, 0, 12, 26, 14], [7, 11, 6, 27, 26], [6, 24, 22, 23, 19]]
There's a good general technique that is often useful when trying to solve tricky constraints like this: try to build something that looks a bit like what you want but doesn't satisfy all the constraints and then compose it with a function that modifies it (e.g. by throwing away the bad bits or patching up bits that don't quite work) to make it satisfy the constraints.
For your case, you could do something like the following:
from hypothesis.strategies import builds, lists, integers
def prune_list(ls):
n = len(ls)
return [
[i for i in sublist if i < n][:5]
for sublist in ls
]
limited_list_strategy = builds(
prune_list,
lists(lists(integers(0, 49), average_size=5), max_size=50, min_size=1)
)
In this we:
The result should satisfy all three conditions you needed.
The average_size parameter isn't strictly necessary but in experimenting with this I found it was a bit too prone to producing empty sublists otherwise.
ETA: Apologies. I've just realised that I misread one of your conditions - this doesn't actually do quite what you want because it doesn't ensure each list is the same length. Here's a way to modify this to fix that (it gets a bit more complicated, so I've switched to using composite instead of builds):
from hypothesis.strategies import composite, lists, integers, permutations
@composite
def limisted_lists(draw):
ls = draw(
lists(lists(integers(0, 49), average_size=5), max_size=50, min_size=1)
)
filler = draw(permutations(range(50)))
sublist_length = draw(integers(0, 5))
n = len(ls)
pruned = [
[i for i in sublist if i < n][:sublist_length]
for sublist in ls
]
for sublist in pruned:
for i in filler:
if len(sublist) == sublist_length:
break
elif i < n:
sublist.append(i)
return pruned
The idea is that we generate a "filler" list that provides the defaults for what a sublist looks like (so they will tend to shrink in the direction of being more similar to eachother) and then draw the length of the sublists to prune to to get that consistency.
This has got pretty complicated I admit. You might want to use RecursivelyIronic's flatmap based version. The main reason I prefer this over that is that it will tend to shrink better, so you'll get nicer examples out of it.
Pretty late, but for posterity: the easiest solution is to pick dimensions, then build up from the element strategy.
from hypothesis.strategies import composite, integers, lists
@composite
def complicated_rectangles(draw, max_N):
list_len = draw(integers(1, max_N))
sublist_len = draw(integers(0, 5))
element_strat = integers(0, min(list_len, 5))
sublist_strat = lists(
element_strat, min_size=sublist_len, max_size=sublist_len)
return draw(lists(
sublist_strat, min_size=list_len, max_size=list_len))