Weird behaviour when using Java ternary operator

后端 未结 3 2322
误落风尘
误落风尘 2021-02-19 20:49

When I write my java code like this:

Map map = new HashMap<>()
Long number =null;
if(map == null)
    number = (long) 0;
else
    numbe         


        
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-19 21:50

    What is happening here? Both these code paths are exactly equivalent isn't it?

    They are not equivalent; the ternary operator has a few caveats.

    The if-true argument of the ternary operator, (long) 0, is of the primitive type long. Consequently, the if-false argument will be automatically unboxed from Long to long (as per JLS §15.25):

    If one of the second and third operands is of primitive type T, and the type of the other is the result of applying boxing conversion (§5.1.7) to T, then the type of the conditional expression is T.

    However, this argument is null (since your map does not contain the string "non-existent key", meaning get() returns null), so a NullPointerException occurs during the unboxing process.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-19 21:52

    They are not equivalent.

    The type of this expression

    (map == null) ? (long)0 : map.get("non-existent key");
    

    is long because the true result has type long.

    The reason this expression is of type long is from section §15.25 of the JLS:

    If one of the second and third operands is of primitive type T, and the type of the other is the result of applying boxing conversion (§5.1.7) to T, then the type of the conditional expression is T.

    When you lookup a non-existant key the map returns null. So, Java is attempting to unbox it to a long. But it's null. So it can't and you get a NullPointerException. You can fix this by saying:

    Long number = (map == null) ? (Long)0L : map.get("non-existent key");
    

    and then you'll be okay.

    However, here,

    if(map == null)
        number = (long) 0;
    else
        number = map.get("non-existent key");
    

    since number is declared as Long, that unboxing to a long never occurs.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-19 21:56

    I commented above suggesting that he ensure map never be null, but that does not help with the ternary problem. As a practical matter, it's easier to let the system do the work for you. He could use Apache Commons Collections 4 and its DefaultedMap class.

    import static org.apache.commons.collections4.map.DefaultedMap.defaultedMap;
    
    Map<String, Long> map = ...;  // Ensure not null.
    Map<String, Long> dMap = defaultedMap(map, 0L); 
    

    Google Guava doesn't have anything as easy as that, but one can wrap map with the Maps.transformValues() method.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题