using user-defined conversions with implicit conversions in comparisons

后端 未结 2 1670
小鲜肉
小鲜肉 2021-02-19 07:09

I am struggling to understand why the following code does not allow an implicit conversion to occur.

#include 
using namespace std;

struct HasConv         


        
相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-02-19 07:13

    The one you want to call is a function template:

    template<class charT, class Traits, class Alloc>
    bool operator<(std::basic_string<charT, Traits, Alloc> const& lhs,
                   std::basic_string<charT, Traits, Alloc> const& rhs);
    

    Deduction fails for the second argument because a HasConversionToString is not a std::basic_string - template argument deduction doesn't look through implicit conversions. As a result, that function template is removed from overload resolution.

    std::experimental::basic_string_view has a similar problem, which was solved by a "sufficient additional overloads" rule (the library must add enough overloads so that comparison between a basic_string_view and something convertible to one works).

    You don't really want such a thing for basic_string, though - having < possibly silently causing a trip to the heap is not really a good idea.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-19 07:25

    http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/template_argument_deduction#Implicit_conversions

    Type deduction does not consider implicit conversions (other than type adjustments listed above): that's the job for overload resolution, which happens later.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题