C# version of __FUNCTION__ macro

Question

Does anyone has a good solution for a C# version of the C++ __FUNCTION__ macro? The compiler does not seem to like it.

Answer 1

Unfortunately there is no equivalent version of that macro in C#. I don't consider the GetCurrentMethodName() solution equivalent to the C++ __FUNCTION__ macro. Namely becase the C++ version is a compile time computation of the name. For C# this is a runtime calculation and incurs a performance hit.

I'm not making any assumtions about the severity of the cost but there is one

Answer 2

The following should work, although it will be evaluated at runtime instead of during compilation.

System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().Name

Answer 3

Try using this instead.

System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().Name

C# doesn't have __LINE__ or __FUNCTION__ macros like C++ but there are equivalents

Answer 4

I use this:

public static string CallerName([CallerMemberName] string callerName = "")
{
    return callerName;
}

Usage example:

s_log.DebugFormat("{0}", CallerName());

The down side of using it is that every time you want to print the caller name, you need to jump to the function ==> time consuming & performance hit! So, I use it for debugging perpose and if I need to print also in production code, I usually inline the function name into the log.Debug, e.g. :

s_log.Debug("CallerName");

HTH..

Answer 5

What I currently use is a function like this:

using System.Diagnostics;

public string __Function() {
    StackTrace stackTrace = new StackTrace();
    return stackTrace.GetFrame(1).GetMethod().Name;
}

When I need __FUNCTION__, I just call the __Function() instead. For example:

Debug.Assert(false, __Function() + ": Unhandled option");

Of course this solution uses reflection too, but it is the best option I can find. Since I only use it for Debugging (not Tracing in release builds) the performance hit is not important.

I guess what I should do is create debug functions and tag them with

[ Conditional("Debug") ]

instead, but I haven't got around to that.

Thanks to Jeff Mastry for his solution to this.

Answer 6

This is added in .NET 4.5.

See @roken's answer here:

Do __LINE__ __FILE__ equivalents exist in C#?