How to mock a method with optional parameter in Google Mock? For example:
class A
{
public:
void set_enable( bool enabled = true );
};
cl
Some modifications to PiQuer's answer. You wouldn't need a wrapper if just add the name, "enabled" to the variable of type bool in your MOCK_METHOD1
like below:
class A
{
public:
void set_enable( bool enabled = true );
};
class MockA : public A
{
MOCK_METHOD1( set_enable, void( bool enabled ) );
};
This is an alternative of Marko's answer: If you don't want to change your original code, just implement the helper in the mock class:
class A
{
public:
virtual void set_enable( bool enabled = true );
};
class MockA : public A
{
MOCK_METHOD1( set_enable_impl, void( bool ) );
virtual void set_enable( bool enabled = true )
{
set_enable_impl( enabled );
{
};
You still have to expect calls of set_enable_impl
in your tests, for example
MockA mockA;
EXPECT_CALL(mockA, set_enable_impl(true)).Times(Exactly(1));
EXPECT_CALL(mockA, set_enable_impl(false)).Times(Exactly(1));
Change implementation of your method set_enable
to use a helper method, like this:
void set_enable( bool enabled = true ) { set_enable_impl(enabled); }
Now, in class MockA
, create a mock method for set_enable_impl
:
MOCK_METHOD1( set_enable_impl, void( bool ) );
Then, in your production code you simply use set_enable
as you would in the first place, while in tests you can set expectations on method set_enable_impl
:
MockA mockA;
EXPECT_CALL(mockA, set_enable_impl(_))...;
An alternative would be to overload the method by having versions with one and zero parameters. It is up to you to determine which way works better for your case.