JMS performance

前端 未结 3 1651
生来不讨喜
生来不讨喜 2021-02-18 17:05

I\'m having a bit of trouble with understanding JMS from a performance perspective. We have this very straightforward code in our application:

QueueConnection co         


        
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-18 17:42

    The only thing you need to create again and again is the msg itself - if you are sending to the same queue.

    So yes, you can remember the Connection, Session and Sender.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-18 17:46

    Here are some relevant parts of the jms spec:

    section 2.8 Multithreading

    JMS Object          Supports Concurrent Use
    Destination         YES
    ConnectionFactory   YES
    Connection          YES
    Session             NO
    MessageProducer     NO
    MessageConsumer     NO
    

    section 4.4.14 Serial Execution of Client Code

    JMS does not cause concurrent execution of client code unless a client explicitly requests it. One way this is done is to define that a session serializes all asynchronous delivery of messages

    So as already mentioned reuse as much as possible. Reuse the ConnectionFactory, Connection and Destinations for all Threads. For each Thread reuse consumers and producers.

    If you are reusing a JMS connection beware, that the JMS Provider will multiplex different sessions on that connections. So even if it is safe to reuse connections it might be faster to create a connection for every session you need.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-18 17:57

    Define "to share".

    If you mean to share among different threads this is very dangerous. You can safely share QueueConnectionFactory object as well as the JMS Connection object. You must not share Session, Sender/Consumer or Message objects. Thats the way how TIBCO EMS works I am not sure about IBM platform but I guess this is very same.

    If you can be sure your "send" method is not called by different threads you can encapulate this into a MySender class with Connection, Session and Sender member variables. But watch out! Do properly close the resources on exit. Thats what Heiko Rupp recommends. Somthing like this:

    class MySender {
        private QueueConnection connection = null;
        private QueueSession session = null;
        private QueueSender sender = null;
    
        public MySender(...) { /* initialize conn/sess/sender */ }
    
        public send(String xmlMsg) { /* sender.send(session.createTextMessage(xmlMsg)) */ }
    
        public close() { /* close all resources */ }
    }
    

    Regarding performance. There is no much room for improvement in JMS standard. Keep messages small and optimize server setting. Use durable destinations only when you need it etc. Read documentation for your platform. But on the client side there is not much room. Some platforms offers additional features to JMS that allows some extra performance gain (batch sends etc) but it depends on the platform. I dont know IBM.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题