I have a program where I need to make a base class which is shared between a dll and some application code. Then I have two different derived classes, one in the dll one in the
In general (regardless of whether the function is static or not), a member function of the derived class can only access protected base class members of objects of its type. It cannot access protected members of the base if the static type is not that of the derived class (or a class derived from it). So:
class Base {
protected:
int var;
} ;
class Derived : public Base {
static void f1( Derived* pDerived )
{
pDerived->var = 2; // legal, access through Derived...
}
static bool Process( Base *pBase )
{
pBase->var = 2 ; // illegal, access not through Derived...
}
} ;
Access specifier applies to the Derived
class handle (reference/pointer/object) and not the methods of Derived
class itself. Even if the method was not static
, you would have ended up with the same error. Because you are not accessing var
with the derived handle. Demo.
The correct way is to provide a setter
method:
class Base {
protected:
int var ;
public:
void setVar(const int v) { var = v; } // <--- add this method
};
Note: There is one more way out, but I am not sure if it's elegant.
(static_cast<Derived*>(pBase))->var = 2;