Rails 3 nested resources short name?

后端 未结 3 2043
攒了一身酷
攒了一身酷 2021-02-15 23:19

I\'m in the process of upgrading a Rails 2.3 app to Rails 3. In the Rails 2.3 router, it was possible to set a :name_prefix of nil on nested resources to get a sho

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-15 23:52

    There's the :shallow option (see the documentation), but I'm not sure it fits your use case:

    resources :sites, :shallow => true
      resources :groups do
        resources :tests
      end
    end
    

    It has the disadvantage of creating a bunch of additional routes:

       group_tests GET    /groups/:group_id/tests(.:format)        {:action=>"index", :controller=>"tests"}
                   POST   /groups/:group_id/tests(.:format)        {:action=>"create", :controller=>"tests"}
    new_group_test GET    /groups/:group_id/tests/creer(.:format)  {:action=>"new", :controller=>"tests"}
         edit_test GET    /tests/:id/modifier(.:format)            {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"tests"}
              test GET    /tests/:id(.:format)                     {:action=>"show", :controller=>"tests"}
                   PUT    /tests/:id(.:format)                     {:action=>"update", :controller=>"tests"}
                   DELETE /tests/:id(.:format)                     {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"tests"}
       site_groups GET    /sites/:site_id/groups(.:format)         {:action=>"index", :controller=>"groups"}
                   POST   /sites/:site_id/groups(.:format)         {:action=>"create", :controller=>"groups"}
    new_site_group GET    /sites/:site_id/groups/creer(.:format)   {:action=>"new", :controller=>"groups"}
        edit_group GET    /groups/:id/modifier(.:format)           {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"groups"}
             group GET    /groups/:id(.:format)                    {:action=>"show", :controller=>"groups"}
                   PUT    /groups/:id(.:format)                    {:action=>"update", :controller=>"groups"}
                   DELETE /groups/:id(.:format)                    {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"groups"}
             sites GET    /sites(.:format)                         {:action=>"index", :controller=>"sites"}
                   POST   /sites(.:format)                         {:action=>"create", :controller=>"sites"}
          new_site GET    /sites/creer(.:format)                   {:action=>"new", :controller=>"sites"}
         edit_site GET    /sites/:id/modifier(.:format)            {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"sites"}
              site GET    /sites/:id(.:format)                     {:action=>"show", :controller=>"sites"}
                   PUT    /sites/:id(.:format)                     {:action=>"update", :controller=>"sites"}
                   DELETE /sites/:id(.:format)                     {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"sites"}
    

    Besides, the shallow nesting only applies to the following routes: :show, :edit, :update, :destroy.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-16 00:16

    I wanted something like this too, clearly it feels redundant to type the prefixes in named routes all the time for resources that only exist as nested. I was able to get what I wanted using scope, I think this is what you sought too:

    resources :sites
    
    scope :path => '/sites/:site_id' do
      resources :groups, :controller => :url_groups do
        post :clone, :on => :member
      end
    end
    
    scope :path => '/sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id' do
      resources :tests, :controller => :test_runs do
        get :latest, :on => :collection
      end
    end
    

    The rake routes output:

           sites GET        /sites(.:format)                                             sites#index
                 POST       /sites(.:format)                                             sites#create
        new_site GET        /sites/new(.:format)                                         sites#new
       edit_site GET        /sites/:id/edit(.:format)                                    sites#edit
            site GET        /sites/:id(.:format)                                         sites#show
                 PUT        /sites/:id(.:format)                                         sites#update
                 DELETE     /sites/:id(.:format)                                         sites#destroy
     clone_group POST       /sites/:site_id/groups/:id/clone(.:format)                   url_groups#clone
          groups GET        /sites/:site_id/groups(.:format)                             url_groups#index
                 POST       /sites/:site_id/groups(.:format)                             url_groups#create
       new_group GET        /sites/:site_id/groups/new(.:format)                         url_groups#new
      edit_group GET        /sites/:site_id/groups/:id/edit(.:format)                    url_groups#edit
           group GET        /sites/:site_id/groups/:id(.:format)                         url_groups#show
                 PUT        /sites/:site_id/groups/:id(.:format)                         url_groups#update
                 DELETE     /sites/:site_id/groups/:id(.:format)                         url_groups#destroy
    latest_tests GET        /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/tests/latest(.:format)      test_runs#latest
           tests GET        /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/tests(.:format)             test_runs#index
                 POST       /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/tests(.:format)             test_runs#create
        new_test GET        /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/tests/new(.:format)         test_runs#new
       edit_test GET        /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/tests/:id/edit(.:format)    test_runs#edit
            test GET        /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/tests/:id(.:format)         test_runs#show
                 PUT        /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/tests/:id(.:format)         test_runs#update
                 DELETE     /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/tests/:id(.:format)         test_runs#destroy
    

    Update: Duh, I left the static segments of the scope paths out of my example. Fixed.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-16 00:18

    Good news is that Rails 3 still has the ability to setup arbitrary/abbreviated url helpers. Rather than a parameter to the resources method, you can create short-hand url helpers with the match declaration in routes.rb.

    Say we have routes setup like this (noting that you need to maintain the 3 levels of nesting):

    resources :sites do
      resources :groups, :controller => :url_groups do
        member do
          post :clone
        end
        resources :test_runs do
          collection do
            get :latest
          end
        end
      end
    end
    

    We get all the standard url helpers (rake routes):

               clone_site_group POST   /sites/:site_id/groups/:id/clone(.:format)                    {:action=>"clone", :controller=>"url_groups"}
    latest_site_group_test_runs GET    /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/test_runs/latest(.:format)   {:action=>"latest", :controller=>"test_runs"}
           site_group_test_runs GET    /sites/:site_id/groups/:group_id/test_runs(.:format)          {:action=>"index", :controller=>"test_runs"}
                               (etc)
    

    But to create something shorter than latest_site_group_test_runs_path(site,group), add a match declaration to routes.rb like this:

    match 'sites/:site_id/groups/:id/test_runs/latest' => 'test_runs#latest', :as => :latest_tests
    

    Now you can use latest_tests_path(site,group) or latest_tests_url(site,group) to generate the fully nested path.

    If your aim is brevity, you could also use implicit polymorphic paths (as long as you have all your models aligned with resource paths).

    For example, given @site #1 and @group #1, all of the following will now generate the same path '/sites/1/groups/1/test_runs/latest':

    = link_to "latest tests", latest_site_group_test_runs_path(@site,@group) # std helper
    = link_to "latest tests", latest_tests_path(@site,@group) # match helper
    = link_to "latest tests", [:latest,@site,@group,:test_runs] # implicit polymorphic path
    

    Hope that helps! Seems like you should be able to get the flexibility you need for the app migration.

    NB: I glossed over the lurking issue of having a model called "Test" since that's off topic;-) There are a few model names that are a neverending source of pain because of namespace and keyword conflicts. My other favourite is when I really wanted to have a mode called "Case" (since that matched the problem domain best. Bad idea, rapidly reversed!)

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题