Public Class MyList
Inherits List(Of MyObject)
Public ReadOnly Property SelectedCount() As Integer
Get
Return Me.Count(Function(obj) obj.IsS
Use AsEnumerable for this purpose:
Public ReadOnly Property SelectedCount() As Integer
Get
Return Me.AsEnumerable.Count(Function(obj) obj.IsSelected)
End Get
End Property
Call the method without the extension method syntax:
Public Class MyList
Inherits List(Of MyObject)
Public ReadOnly Property SelectedCount() As Integer
Get
Return Enumerable.Count(Me, Function(obj) obj.IsSelected)
End Get
End Property
End Class
Make sure you have added an import to System.Linq.
To answer #4, this works fine in C#:
public class MyObject { public bool IsSelected { get { return true; } } }
public class MyList : List<MyObject>
{
public int SelectedCount
{
get { return this.Count(x => x.IsSelected); }
}
}
You can cast Me
to IEnumerable(Of MyObject)
:
Return DirectCast(Me, IEnumerable(Of MyObject)).Count(Function(obj) obj.IsSelected)
Or use Enumerable.Count()
method directly:
Return Enumerable.Count(Me, Function(obj) obj.IsSelected)
Extension Methods are transformed by compiler into direct static (shared
in VB) methods calls, so there is no difference.
Have no idea, really.
Casting to underlying type does not change the object itself, so there is no performance penalty (unless boxing
is involved, what is not a case here).
C# does not allow properties with parameters and it requires properties to be called without ()
, so yes, it's better in situations like this one.
In VB.NET both Me.Count()
and Me.Count
refer to Count
property of List(Of T
). In C# this.Count
would refer to property and this.Count()
would refer the extension method (because of parentheses).