Access variables programmatically by name in Ruby

Question

I\'m not entirely sure if this is possible in Ruby, but hopefully there\'s an easy way to do this. I want to declare a variable and later find out the name of the variable.

Answer 1

Building on joshmsmoore, something like this would probably do it:

# Returns the first instance variable whose value == x
# Returns nil if no name maps to the given value
def instance_variable_name_for(x)
  self.instance_variables.find do |var|
    x == self.instance_variable_get(var)
  end
end

Answer 2

The closest thing to a real answer to you question is to use the Enumerable method each_with_index instead of each, thusly:

my_array = [foo, baz, bar]
my_array.each_with_index do |item, index|
  if item.class != Array
    puts "#{my_array[index]} wasn't an Array. It was a/an #{item.class}"
  end
end

I removed the return statement from the block you were passing to each/each_with_index because it didn't do/mean anything. Each and each_with_index both return the array on which they were operating.

There's also something about scope in blocks worth noting here: if you've defined a variable outside of the block, it will be available within it. In other words, you could refer to foo, bar, and baz directly inside the block. The converse is not true: variables that you create for the first time inside the block will not be available outside of it.

Finally, the do/end syntax is preferred for multi-line blocks, but that's simply a matter of style, though it is universal in ruby code of any recent vintage.

Answer 3

You need to re-architect your solution. Even if you could do it (you can't), the question simply doesn't have a reasonable answer.

Imagine a get_name method.

a = 1
get_name(a)

Everyone could probably agree this should return 'a'

b = a
get_name(b)

Should it return 'b', or 'a', or an array containing both?

[b,a].each do |arg|
  get_name(arg)
end

Should it return 'arg', 'b', or 'a' ?

def do_stuff( arg )
  get_name(arg)
do
do_stuff(b)

Should it return 'arg', 'b', or 'a', or maybe the array of all of them? Even if it did return an array, what would the order be and how would I know how to interpret the results?

The answer to all of the questions above is "It depends on the particular thing I want at the time." I'm not sure how you could solve that problem for Ruby.

Answer 4

Foo is only a location to hold a pointer to the data. The data has no knowledge of what points at it. In Smalltalk systems you could ask the VM for all pointers to an object, but that would only get you the object that contained the foo variable, not foo itself. There is no real way to reference a vaiable in Ruby. As mentioned by one answer you can stil place a tag in the data that references where it came from or such, but generally that is not a good apporach to most problems. You can use a hash to receive the values in the first place, or use a hash to pass to your loop so you know the argument name for validation purposes as in DBR's answer.

Answer 5

It seems you are trying to solve a problem that has a far easier solution..

Why not just store the data in a hash? If you do..

data_container = {'foo' => ['goo', 'baz']}

..it is then utterly trivial to get the 'foo' name.

That said, you've not given any context to the problem, so there may be a reason you can't do this..

[edit] After clarification, I see the issue, but I don't think this is the problem.. With [foo, bar, bla], it's equivalent like saying ['content 1', 'content 2', 'etc']. The actual variables name is (or rather, should be) utterly irrelevant. If the name of the variable is important, that is exactly why hashes exist.

The problem isn't with iterating over [foo, bar] etc, it's the fundamental problem with how the SOAP server is returing the data, and/or how you're trying to use it.

The solution, I would say, is to either make the SOAP server return hashes, or, since you know there is always going to be three elements, can you not do something like..

{"foo" => foo, "goo" => goo, "bar"=>bar}.each do |param_name, param|
      if param.class != Array
        puts "#{param_name} wasn't an Array. It was a/an #{param.class}"
        puts "Error: #{param_name} wasn't an Array"
      end
end