I am trying to figure out why the tee operator, %T>%, does not work when I pass the data to a ggplot command.
This works fine
library(ggplot2)
library(dp
Either
mtcars %T>%
{print(ggplot(.) + geom_point(aes(cyl, mpg)))} %>%
{ggplot(.) + geom_point(aes(mpg, cyl))}
or abandon the %T>%
operator and use an ordinary pipe with the "%>T%" operation made explicit as a new function as suggested in this answer
techo <- function(x){
print(x)
x
}
mtcars %>%
{techo( ggplot(.) + geom_point(aes(cyl, mpg)) )} %>%
{ggplot(.) + geom_point(aes(mpg, cyl))}
As TFlick noted, the reason the %T>% operator doesn't work here is because of the precedence of operations: %any%
is done before +
.
Note that a returned ggplot object is a list with $data field. This can be taken advantaged of. Personally I think the style is cleaner:)
ggpass=function(pp){
print(pp)
return(pp$data)
}
mtcars %>%
{ggplot() + geom_point(aes(cyl, mpg))} %>% ggpass() %>%
{ggplot() + geom_point(aes(mpg, cyl))}
I think your problem has to do with order of operations. The +
is stronger than the %T>%
operator (according to the ?Syntax
help page). You need to pass in the data= parameter to ggplot
before you add the geom_point
otherwise things get messy. I think you want
mtcars %T>%
{print(ggplot(.) + geom_point(aes(cyl, mpg)))} %>%
{ggplot(.) + geom_point(aes(mpg, cyl))}
which uses the functional "short-hand" notation