Function/Method Overloading C++: Data type confusion?

Question

I\'m having some trouble overloading methods in C++. As an example of the problem, I have a class with a number of methods being overloaded, and each method having one parameter

Answer 1

The order makes no difference. The method to call is selected by analyzing the types of arguments and matching them to the types of parameters. In case there's no exact match, the best-matching method is selected. In your case it happens to be the bool method.

You are supplying an argument of type const char[7]. According to the C++ overloading rules, the best path here is to let const char[7] decay to const char * and then convert it to bool using a standard conversion. The path with converting to std::string is considered worse, since it would involve a user-defined conversion from const char * to std::string. Generally, user-defined conversions lose overload resolution process to standard conversions. This is what happens in your case as well.

If you need std::string version to be called here, provide an explicit overload for const char * type, and delegate the call to std::string version by converting the argument to std::string type explicitly

void Method(const char *paramater /* sic! */)
{
  Method(std::string(paramater));
}

Answer 2

The order is of no importance. The problem here is that when you invoke

Method("string");

you are passing a const char[]. This will be converted to bool implicitly. What you want to do is pass an std::string explicitly:

Method( std::string("string"));

Answer 3

As Charles already pointed out, this happens due to an unwanted implicit conversion. If you want to avoid that, use a std::string constructor: Method(std::string("string")); or cast it to std::string:

Method(static_cast<std::string>("string"));

However, the order of your declarations isn't important. Also check your spelling of the word "parameter" ;)

Answer 4

Not answering your question but, just out of curiosity, is there a hidden reason for not using a template method instead of defining an overload version for each type?

class SomeClass
{
    public:
    ...
    template <typename T>
    void Method(T paramater);
};

Answer 5

You can add an explict keyword so as to take the intended argument.

Answer 6

The string literal "string" has type const char[] which can be implicity converted to bool. This is the best conversion candidate to one of your overloaded functions although it's not likely to be the most useful one.

If your intention was to have string literals be handled by the overload taking a std::string, then you need to add an overload taking a const char* and make the implementation call the std::string version.