I have a problem with my Angular App on the Internet Explorer. It runs everywhere without a problem (Chrome, Mozilla, Edge), but on on the IE.
I have analyzed with th
I faced the same issue. Looked at the polyfill and it is threatening huge. Here is 2 lines short solution.
The OP basically needs to create simple array from his array-like object. I used to my taste the most efficient 2 lines plain for
loop (I had to make array from HTML DOM nodelist array-like object, same applicable to JavaScript arguments
object).
For the OP's case it could sound this way:
var temp_array = [],
length = tmp.length;
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) {
temp_array.push(tmp[i]);
}
// Here you get the normal array "temp_array" containing all items
// from your `tmp` Set.
Make it separate function and you get 3 lines universal reusable solution for the IE<9 case.
Here is how the separate function may look like:
/**
* @param arr The array | array-like data structure.
* @param callback The function to process each element in the 'arr'.
* The callback signature and usage is assumed similar to the
* native JS 'forEach' callback argument usage.
*/
function customEach(arr, callback) {
'use strict';
var l = arr.length;
for (var i = 0; i < l; i++) {
callback(arr[i], i, arr);
}
};
PS: here is the relevant description for forEach callback to see how to use the customEach
callback.
While it's not supported on IE, you may use the polyfill from MDN.
You could use slice.call for array-like objects. This means your code would read:
myDataSet[index - 1].data = [].slice.call(tmp);
Array.from
not supported in the following document modes: Quirks, Internet Explorer 6 standards, Internet Explorer 7 standards, Internet Explorer 8 standards, Internet Explorer 9 standards, Internet Explorer 10 standards, Internet Explorer 11 standards. Not supported in Windows 8.1 (compatibility reference)
Just add the code below to your page (JS code was copied from developer.mozilla.org). It will emulate an ES6's Array.from
method.
Array.from was added to the ECMA-262 standard in the 6th edition; as such it may not be present in other implementations of the standard. You can work around this by inserting the following code at the beginning of your scripts, allowing use of Array.from in implementations that don't natively support it. This algorithm is exactly the one specified in ECMA-262, 6th edition, assuming Object and TypeError have their original values and that callback.call evaluates to the original value of Function.prototype.call. In addition, since true iterables can not be polyfilled, this implementation does not support generic iterables as defined in the 6th edition of ECMA-262.
if (!Array.from) {
Array.from = (function () {
var toStr = Object.prototype.toString;
var isCallable = function (fn) {
return typeof fn === 'function' || toStr.call(fn) === '[object Function]';
};
var toInteger = function (value) {
var number = Number(value);
if (isNaN(number)) { return 0; }
if (number === 0 || !isFinite(number)) { return number; }
return (number > 0 ? 1 : -1) * Math.floor(Math.abs(number));
};
var maxSafeInteger = Math.pow(2, 53) - 1;
var toLength = function (value) {
var len = toInteger(value);
return Math.min(Math.max(len, 0), maxSafeInteger);
};
// The length property of the from method is 1.
return function from(arrayLike/*, mapFn, thisArg */) {
// 1. Let C be the this value.
var C = this;
// 2. Let items be ToObject(arrayLike).
var items = Object(arrayLike);
// 3. ReturnIfAbrupt(items).
if (arrayLike == null) {
throw new TypeError("Array.from requires an array-like object - not null or undefined");
}
// 4. If mapfn is undefined, then let mapping be false.
var mapFn = arguments.length > 1 ? arguments[1] : void undefined;
var T;
if (typeof mapFn !== 'undefined') {
// 5. else
// 5. a If IsCallable(mapfn) is false, throw a TypeError exception.
if (!isCallable(mapFn)) {
throw new TypeError('Array.from: when provided, the second argument must be a function');
}
// 5. b. If thisArg was supplied, let T be thisArg; else let T be undefined.
if (arguments.length > 2) {
T = arguments[2];
}
}
// 10. Let lenValue be Get(items, "length").
// 11. Let len be ToLength(lenValue).
var len = toLength(items.length);
// 13. If IsConstructor(C) is true, then
// 13. a. Let A be the result of calling the [[Construct]] internal method of C with an argument list containing the single item len.
// 14. a. Else, Let A be ArrayCreate(len).
var A = isCallable(C) ? Object(new C(len)) : new Array(len);
// 16. Let k be 0.
var k = 0;
// 17. Repeat, while k < len… (also steps a - h)
var kValue;
while (k < len) {
kValue = items[k];
if (mapFn) {
A[k] = typeof T === 'undefined' ? mapFn(kValue, k) : mapFn.call(T, kValue, k);
} else {
A[k] = kValue;
}
k += 1;
}
// 18. Let putStatus be Put(A, "length", len, true).
A.length = len;
// 20. Return A.
return A;
};
}());
}
Original poster of question wrote:
What I am doing there is that I have a
Set()
namedtmp
...
But we have here 3 answers for already more than 4 years and nobody has tested it with a Set object.
The huge polyfill from MDN does not work with Set
object!
It was copied from MDN and pasted into the accepted answer without testing.
My polyfill solution is also much shorter than incorrect and huge polyfill from MDN.
In the following solution you will find the explanation about the function(s) and their parameters in comments.
/**
* @param "arr" (required) - array-like or iterable object to convert it to an array.
* @param "callbackFn" (optional) - function to call on every element of the array.
* @param "thisArg" (optional) - value to use as this when executing callback
* Return value - new Array instance
*
* The callbackFn argument usage is like in Array.map() callback.
* The callbackFn function accepts the following arguments:
* @param "currentValue" (required) - the current element being processed in the array.
* @param "index" (optional) - the index of the current element being processed in the array.
* @param "array" (optional) - he array map was called upon.
* Callback function that is called for every element of "arr". Each time callback executes, the returned value is added to new array ("arNew").
*/
function arrayFrom(arr, callbackFn, thisArg)
{
//if you need you can uncomment the following line
//if(!arr || typeof arr == 'function')throw new Error('This function requires an array-like object - not null, undefined or a function');
var arNew = [],
k = [], // used for convert Set to an Array
i = 0;
//if you do not need a Set object support then
//you can comment or delete the following if statement
if(window.Set && arr instanceof Set)
{
//we use forEach from Set object
arr.forEach(function(v){k.push(v)});
arr = k
}
for(; i < arr.length; i++)
arNew[i] = callbackFn
? callbackFn.call(thisArg, arr[i], i, arr)
: arr[i];
return arNew
}
//You could also use it without the following line, but it is not recommended because native function is faster.
Array.from = Array.from || arrayFrom; //We set it as polyfill
//HOW TO USE IT:
function myCallback1(x){return x+x}
function myCallback2(o){return o.innerHTML}
var str = 'Super!',
array = str.split(''),//['S','u','p','e','r','!']
arrayLike1 = window.Set ? new Set(str) : array, //array for IE < 10. Only 11 version of IE supports Set.
arrayLike2 = document.querySelectorAll('b');//NodeList
arrayLike3 = document.getElementsByTagName('b');//HTMLCollection
console.log(arrayFrom(str).join(','));//S,u,p,e,r,!
console.log(arrayFrom(array).join(','));//S,u,p,e,r,!
console.log(arrayFrom(str, myCallback1).join(','));//SS,uu,pp,ee,rr,!!
console.log(arrayFrom(arrayLike1, myCallback1).join(','));//SS,uu,pp,ee,rr,!!
console.log(arrayFrom(arrayLike2, myCallback2).join(','));//aaa,bbb
console.log(arrayFrom(arrayLike3, myCallback2).join(','));//aaa,bbb
//You can also use it as polyfill:
console.log(Array.from(str).join(','));//S,u,p,e,r,!
<b>aaa</b> <b>bbb</b>
Do not forget that a Set
has unique values! For example:
//Only 11 version of IE and all modern browsers support Set.
var ar = [];
new Set('mama').forEach(function(v){ar.push(v)});
console.log(ar.join(',')); // 'm','a'