We use ODP.NET to perform queries on Oracle databases, and normally it works fine. There is a particular database, and a particular view in that database, though, that we just c
Immediate thoughts are
Suggestions
A view adds a different magnitude of complexity. A "SELECT column FROM table WHERE rownum < 5" has probably just a single explain plan, picking data from a single local object.
For a view you should start by getting the view text SELECT TEXT FROM ALL_VIEWS WHERE VIEW_NAME = ...
There's a lot that can be different between an ODP.NET and an SQL Developer session. I'd think about NLS parameters (such as date formats) and character set settings.
If you can locate the SQL in v$sql, you can do a DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR(sql_id) to look at the different plans and see if you can identify the problem.
On a project I was working on at my former employer, we were using odp.net to talk to a large retailing system database and we'd get connection lost errors.
It took a lot of effort to prove, but it ended up being a corrupt index inside the Oracle database that was only being hit by our query. The DBA's eventually traced it to a coredump of the process that run on the Sun box when our query was being executed. We didn't use any sort of query hinting etc, but when we ran the same query in Toad, it didn't hit this particular index. strange??<<
It had nothing to do with the ODP.NET provider. The problem was that the library we use to create connections for us (which, of course, is not used by Oracle SQL Developer, and which I did not use when I tried the Microsoft provider) was always executing the following statements before doing anything:
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP = LINGUISTIC
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT = BINARY_CI
These make Oracle case-insensitive. But, they also render all conventional indexes useless. Because we were querying from a View, it had ordering built in. And because we don't own the database, we can't make the indexes linguistic to fix the performance problem.
Providing a way to not execute those statements in this (rare) scenario fixed the problem.