Different ways to call methods in ABAP

前端 未结 3 1951
暖寄归人
暖寄归人 2021-02-14 08:57

Sorry for this basic ABAP question. What are the different ways to call methods in ABAP? And what are their \"official\" names? I\'ve heard of perform, method call, and interna

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-14 08:58

    These are the possibilities of an inline method call.

    If you are calling so called functional method which has only IMPORTING parameters and optionally one RETURN parameter you can call it like this.

    CLASS lcl_test DEFINITION.
      PUBLIC SECTION.
        CLASS-METHODS:
          func_meth
            IMPORTING
              i_param TYPE i
            RETURNING
              VALUE(r_res) TYPE char1.
    ENDCLASS.
    
    l_res = lcl_test=>func_meth( 1 ).
    
    * you could also call it like this
    l_res = lcl_test=>func_meth( i_param = 1 ).
    
    * also this variant is possible
    l_res = lcl_test=>func_meth( EXPORTING i_param = 1 ).
    
    * the traditional CALL METHOD syntax would be like this
    CALL METHOD lcl_test=>func_meth
      EXPORTING
        i_param = 1
      RECEIVING
        r_res = l_res.
    

    If there is more than one IMPORTING parameter you have to specify names of the parameters.

    CLASS lcl_test DEFINITION.
      PUBLIC SECTION.
        CLASS-METHODS:
          func_meth
            IMPORTING
              i_param1 TYPE i
              i_param2 TYPE i
            RETURNING
              VALUE(r_res) TYPE char1.
    ENDCLASS.
    
    l_res = lcl_test=>func_meth(
       i_param1 = 1
       i_param2 = 2
    ).
    

    If there are EXPORTING or CHANGING parameters in the method then an inline call is still possible but the parameter categories have to be explicitly specified.

    CLASS lcl_test DEFINITION.
      PUBLIC SECTION.
        CLASS-METHODS:
          func_meth
            IMPORTING
              i_param TYPE i
            EXPORTING
              e_param TYPE c
            CHANGING
              c_param TYPE n.
    ENDCLASS.
    
    lcl_test=>func_meth(
      EXPORTING
        i_param = 1
      IMPORTING
        e_param = l_param
      CHANGING
        c_param = l_paramc
    ).
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-14 09:21

    Good luck in your quest - you will find this task to be much harder than anticipated. For example, ABAP contains a macro processing facility that will make it really hard to find out that an actual method call is taking place. A malicious example that will compile nonetheless:

    DATA: l_foo TYPE c LENGTH 32.
    
    DEFINE foo.
      l_&4 = cl_&1_&3&5&2&9if_&1_&3&5_&8~&7_&3&5_c&6( ).
    END-OF-DEFINITION.
    
    foo system = u foo uid 32 create static >.
    

    You will find that macros are used extensively in some parts of the system. Good luck finding method calls in that kind of stuff without using the built-in parser and macro processor.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-14 09:22

    You have massively mixed up many things. Lets be kind, and start with some basics here:

    Method is the official name of a member function of a class, means, if You talk about methods, You talk about object oriented prorgamming ( OOP ). There are about two or three ways of method call variants, at least in abap. Lets go into detail later, after You promise me, to read about this, If You decide to develop following OO-paradigms. And You should.

    Function is just a function, a small(or big) piece of code, which can be called from several callers, to be reused. It is no OOP paradigm, and exists since prorgamming started. Nevertheless in abap it has a slight "bigger" definition, let us talk about this in detail, if You promise me, to read about it. And You should, If You want to develop ABAP at all.

    Perform ? "Perform" is an abap keyword to call form-routines. Form-routines are the real old school functions-equivalent in abap, most similiar to functions from the good old times, when programming started. Small pieces of reusable code, which can be calles from anywhere in Your prorgamm, but sometimes from somewhere else ( this is too far for You now ).

    So, if You are mixing up those three ( or two of those three ) already, then You are not even in a good position, to talk about internal or inline, at all. I am sorry, but it is, as it is. It is no offending.

    Do You ever developed in another language ?

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题