I was hoping to squeeze a tiny performance gain out of many calls to a function that returns a timestamp. The function looks like this:
public static long get_n
No difference, and Calendar.getTimeInMillis() is also same. because the return results is the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 GMT. you will get a same long value whereever you are all over the word.
No difference, except for the very slight lag caused by allocating a Date object.
From the javadoc the the default constructor of Date
:
Allocates a Date object and initializes it so that it represents the time at which it was allocated, measured to the nearest millisecond.
A Date
is just a thin wrapper around the epoch milliseconds, without any concept of timezones. Only when rendered to a String is timezone considered, but that is handled by the Locale
class.
I would suggest running a unit test (ex. https://gist.github.com/ledlogic/8532028). I saw only a slight overall benefit to running the System.currentTimeMillis versus the (new Date()).getTime().
1 billion runs: (1000 outer loops, 1,000,000 inner loops):
System.currentTimeMillis(): 14.353 seconds
(new Date()).getTime(): 16.668 seconds
Individual runs would sometimes be slightly biased toward the later approach - depending on your system activity.