Well, I know why, it\'s because there isn\'t a conversion, but why isn\'t there a conversion? Why can forward iterators be turned to reverse iterators but not the other way roun
You can get forward iterator from reverse iterator using this code
container.begin() + (reverseIter - container.rbegin() - 1);
You could write a helper function. One particularity of reverse_iterator
is that base()
gives a forward iterator that is next from the value that the reverse iterator dereferences to. This is because a reverse iterator physically points to the element after the one it logically points to. So to have the forward iterator to the same item as your reverse_iterator, you'll need to decrement the result of base()
by one, or you could increment the reverse iterator first, then take the .base()
of that.
Both examples are shown below:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <iterator>
//result is undefined if passed container.rend()
template <class ReverseIterator>
typename ReverseIterator::iterator_type make_forward(ReverseIterator rit)
{
return --(rit.base()); // move result of .base() back by one.
// alternatively
// return (++rit).base() ;
// or
// return (rit+1).base().
}
int main()
{
std::vector<int> vec(1, 1);
std::vector<int>::reverse_iterator rit = vec.rbegin();
std::vector<int>::iterator fit = make_forward(rit);
std::cout << *fit << ' ' << *rit << '\n';
}
Warning: this behavior is different from that of the reverse_iterator(iterator)
constructor.
It's very common to have two (reverse) iterators span a range of values (such as in begin(),end()
and rbegin(),rend()
). For any range described by the two reverse iterators rA,rB
, the range rB.base(),rA.base()
will span the same range in the forward direction.
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::vector<int> vec{10,11,12,13,14,15};
// spans the range from 13 to 10
auto rfirst=std::rbegin(vec)+2;
auto rlast=std::rend(vec);
// Loops forward, prints 10 11 12 13
for(auto it = rlast.base(); it != rfirst.base(); ++it){
std::cout << *it << " ";
}
}
If conceptually you are only interested in a single item (such as the result of find_if
), then use make_forward
by @visitor. Even in this case, the range idea helps to keep track of the validity of the reverse iterator:
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
int main() {
std::vector<int> vec{10,11,12,13,14,15};
auto rfirst=std::rbegin(vec);
auto rlast=std::rend(vec);
auto rfound = std::find_if(rfirst,rlast, [](int v){ return v<13; });
if(rfound != rlast){
std::cout << *rfound << " "; // prints 12
auto forwardFound = make_forward(rfound) ;
std::cout << *forwardFound << " "; // prints 12
}
}