Java 8, Guice 4.0 and Akka 2.3.9 here. I am trying to figure out how to annotate my actor classes with JSR330-style @Inject
annotations, and then wire them all up v
In case anyone found this question, you need to use IndirectActorProducer, I referred to the Spring example and changed it to use Guice instead.
/**
* An actor producer that lets Guice create the Actor instances.
*/
public class GuiceActorProducer implements IndirectActorProducer {
final String actorBeanName;
final Injector injector;
final Class<? extends Actor> actorClass;
public GuiceActorProducer(Injector injector, String actorBeanName, Class<? extends Actor> actorClass) {
this.actorBeanName = actorBeanName;
this.injector = injector;
this.actorClass = actorClass;
}
@Override
public Actor produce() {
return injector.getInstance(Key.get(Actor.class, Names.named(actorBeanName)));
}
@Override
public Class<? extends Actor> actorClass() {
return actorClass;
}
}
In the module
public class BookingModule extends AbstractModule {
@Override
protected void configure() {
// Raw actor class, meant to be used by GuiceActorProducer.
// Do not use this directly
bind(Actor.class).annotatedWith(
Names.named(BookingActor.ACTOR_BEAN_NAME)).to(
BookingActor.class);
}
@Singleton
@Provides
@Named(BookingActor.ACTOR_ROUTER_BEAN_NAME)
ActorRef systemActorRouter(Injector injector, ActorSystem actorSystem) {
Props props = Props.create(GuiceActorProducer.class, injector, BookingActor.ACTOR_BEAN_NAME, actorClass);
actorSystem.actorOf(props.withRouter(new RoundRobinPool(DEFAULT_ROUTER_SIZE)), BookingActor.ACTOR_ROUTER_BEAN_NAME);
}
}
Use Creator to create ActorRef
s in provider methods of your guice module. To distinguish between the different ActorRef
s, which are untyped, use annotations on your provider methods and injection points as you would any guice system. For example,
In your guice module:
@Override
protected void configure() {
bind(ActorSystem.class).toInstance(ActorSystem.apply());
bind(FizzService.class).toInstance(new FizzServiceImpl());
}
@Provides @Singleton @Named("fizzActor")
ActorRef serviceActorRef(final ActorSystem system, final FizzService fizzService) {
return system.actorOf(Props.create(new Creator<Actor>() {
@Override
public Actor create() throws Exception {
return new FizzActor(fizzService);
}
}));
}
Then to use the actor service, inject a specific ActorRef
:
class ClientOfFizzActor {
@Inject
ClientOfFizzActor(@Named("fizzActor") ActorRef fizzActorRef) {..}
}
It looks cleaner if the Props.create(..)
clause is a static factory method in your actor class.
So I have been playing around with Akka and Guice recently alot and I feel that those two don't play too well together.
What I suggest is you take a similar approach what Play is doing.
Kutschkem's answer comes closest to that.
Creator
. Don't try to do @AssisstedInject
in your Creator
as this will imply that you will need a new creator for every Actor that you want to create. Personally I believe that initializing this in the actor is better done through messaging.Here is a code example using current Akka 2.5. This is the preferred setup we chose for our Akka 2.5 deployment. For brevity I did not provide the Module, but it should be clear from the way the Members are injected, what you want to provide.
Code:
class ActorCreator implements Creator<MyActor>
@Inject
Injector injector;
public MyActor create() {
return injector.getInstance(MyActor.class);
}
}
class MyActor extends AbstractActor {
@Inject
SomeController object;
@Nullable
MyDataObject data;
public ReceiveBuilder createReceiveBuilder() {
return receiveBuilder()
.match(MyDataObject.class, m -> { /* doInitialize() */ })
.build();
}
}
class MyParentActor extends AbstractActor {
@Inject
ActorCreator creator;
void createChild() {
getContext().actorOf(new Props(creator));
}
void initializeChild(ActorRef child, MyDataObject obj) {
child.tell(obj);
}
}
Use an akka Creator:
public class GuiceCreator<T> implements Creator<T> {
Class<T> clz;
Module module;
/*Constructor*/
public T create() {
Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(this.module);
return injector.getInstance(this.clz);
}
}
Then use Props.create with your shiny new guice-based creator.
Disclaimer: I don't actually know Akka, the mentioned information comes from browsing the documentation and JavaDoc.
Unless you are trying to bind UntypedActor
to FizzActor
, then you can just inject it into other classes as is:
class SomeOtherClass {
@Inject
public SomeOtherClass(FizzActor fizzActor) {
//do stuff
}
}
If you're trying to bind it to the interface, you'll need to specifically do that in the module:
public class MyActorSystemModule extends AbstractModule {
@Override
public void configure() {
bind(MyService.class).to(MyServiceImpl.class);
bind(UntypedActor.class).to(FizzActor.class);
}
}
Edit:
What about using @Named
to distinguish the UntypedActor
, e.g.:
class SomeOtherClass {
@Inject
public SomeOtherClass(@Named("fizzActor")UntypedActor fizzActor, @Named("fooActor") UntypedActor fooActor) {
//do stuff
}
}
Then in your module you could do the akka lookups:
public class MyActorSystemModule extends AbstractModule {
ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("MySystem");
@Override
public void configure() {
bind(MyService.class).to(MyServiceImpl.class);
}
@Provides
@Named("fizzActor")
public UntypedActor getFizzActor() {
return system.actorOf(Props.create(FizzActor.class), "fizzActor");
}
@Provides
@Named("fooActor")
public UntypedActor getFooActor() {
return system.actorOf(Props.create(FooActor.class), "fooActor");
}
}
Generic Akka Guice integration without dependency on Play, keeping in mind, not the only actor should be created in the actor system.
import akka.actor.Actor;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import com.google.inject.AbstractModule;
import com.google.inject.Provider;
import com.google.inject.name.Names;
public abstract class AkkaGuiceModule extends AbstractModule {
protected <T extends Actor> void bindActor(Class<T> actorClass, String name) {
bind(actorClass);
Provider<ActorSystem> actorSystemProvider = getProvider(ActorSystem.class);
Provider<T> actorProvider = getProvider(actorClass);
bind(ActorRef.class)
.annotatedWith(Names.named(name))
.toProvider(ActorRefProvider.of(actorSystemProvider, actorProvider, name))
.asEagerSingleton();
}
}
Generic ActorRefProvider to create ActorRef for each Actor
import akka.actor.Actor;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.japi.Creator;
import com.google.inject.Provider;
import lombok.Value;
@Value(staticConstructor = "of")
public class ActorRefProvider<T extends Actor> implements Provider<ActorRef> {
private Provider<ActorSystem> actorSystemProvider;
private Provider<T> actorProvider;
private String name;
public final class ActorCreator implements Creator<Actor> {
@Override
public Actor create() {
return actorProvider.get();
}
}
@Override
public ActorRef get() {
return actorSystemProvider.get().actorOf(Props.create(new ActorCreator()), name);
}
}
Usage example
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import com.google.inject.Provides;
import com.typesafe.config.Config; // optional
public class MyAkkaModule extends AkkaGuiceModule {
@Provides
@Singleton
ActorSystem actorSystem(Config config) {
return ActorSystem.create("actor-system-name", config);
}
@Override
protected void configure() {
bindActor(SomeActor1.class, "actorName1");
bindActor(SomeActor2.class, "actorName2");
}
}