Web components: How to work with children?

后端 未结 2 1531
慢半拍i
慢半拍i 2021-02-13 17:35

I\'m currently experimenting with StencilJS to create some web components.

Now I know that there is and named slots and all that stuff. Comin

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-02-13 18:07

    Thank you for the answer Gil.

    I was thinking of something similar before (setting state etc. - because of timing issues that might come up). I didn't like the solution though, because you're then doing a state change within componentDidLoad, which will trigger another load just after the component did load. This seems dirty and unperfomant.

    The little bit with innerHTML={child.outerHTML} helped me alot though.

    It seems like you can also simply do:

    import {Component, Element, State} from '@stencil/core';
    
    @Component({
        tag: 'slotted-element',
        styleUrl: 'slotted-element.css',
        shadow: true
    })
    export class SlottedElement {
        @Element() host: HTMLDivElement;
    
        render() {
            return (
                <div>
                    <ul>
                        {Array.from(this.host.children)
                              .map(child => <li innerHTML={child.outerHTML} />)}
                    </ul>
                </div>
            );
        }
    }
    

    I thought you might run into timing issues, because during render() the child elements of the host have already been removed to make space for whatever render() returns. But since shadow-dom and light-dom coexist nicely within the host component, I guess there shouldn't be any issues.

    I don't really know why you have to use innerHTML though. Coming from React I'm used to doing:

    {Array.from(this.host.children)
          .map(child => <li>{child}</li>)}
    

    And I thought that is basic JSX syntax and that since Stencil is also using JSX I could do that, too. Doesn't work though. innerHTML does the trick for me. Thanks again.

    EDIT: The timing issues I mentioned will appear if you're not using shadow-dom though. Some strange things start to happen an you'll end up with a lot of duplicate children. Though you can do (might have side effects):

    import {Component, Element, State} from '@stencil/core';
    
    @Component({
        tag: 'slotted-element',
        styleUrl: 'slotted-element.css',
        shadow: true
    })
    export class SlottedElement {
        children: Element[];
    
        @Element() host: HTMLDivElement;
    
        componentWillLoad() {
          this.children = Array.from(this.host.children);
          this.host.innerHTML = '';
        }
    
        render() {
            return (
                <div>
                    <ul>
                        {this.children.map(child => <li innerHTML={child.outerHTML} />)}
                    </ul>
                </div>
            );
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-13 18:09

    Using slots you don't need to put a condition in your render function. You can put the no children element (in your example the span) inside the slot element and if no children are provided to the slot it will fall back to it. For example:

    render() {
        return (
            <div>
                <slot><span>no elements</span></slot>
            </div>
        );
    }
    

    Answering the comment you wrote - you can do such a thing but with some coding and not out of the box. Every slot element has an assignedNodes function. Using that knowledge and the understanding of Stencil component life cycle you can do something such as:

    import {Component, Element, State} from '@stencil/core';
    
    @Component({
        tag: 'slotted-element',
        styleUrl: 'slotted-element.css',
        shadow: true
    })
    export class SlottedElement {
        @Element() host: HTMLDivElement;
        @State() children: Array<any> = [];
    
        componentWillLoad() {
            let slotted = this.host.shadowRoot.querySelector('slot') as HTMLSlotElement;
            this.children = slotted.assignedNodes().filter((node) => { return node.nodeName !== '#text'; });
        }
    
        render() {
            return (
                <div>
                    <slot />
                    <ul>
                        {this.children.map(child => { return <li innerHTML={child.outerHTML}></li>; })}
                    </ul>
                </div>
            );
        }
    }
    

    This is not an optimal solution and it will require that the style of the slot should have display set to none (cause you don't want to show it). Also, it will only work with simple elements that only need rendering and not requiring events or anything else (cause it only uses them as html string and not as objects).

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题