I have a certain design strategy where the constructor of my class is private and can only be constructed by friends of the class. Inside the friend function, I am trying to cre
Here is another approach I've seen used, apparently known as the passkey idiom : have the public constructor require a private access token.
class Spam {
struct Token {};
friend void Foo();
public:
Spam(Token, int mem) : mem(mem) {}
private:
int mem;
};
void Foo() {
std::unique_ptr<Spam> spam = std::make_unique<Spam>(Spam::Token{}, 10);
}
void Bar() {
// error: 'Spam::Token Spam::token' is private
// std::unique_ptr<Spam> spam = std::make_unique<Spam>(Spam::Token{}, 10);
}
Why am I not able to compile?
You are unable to compile because make_unique
is not a friend of Spam
.
An alternative solution to making make_unique
a friend is to move the creation of the unique_ptr into Spam
.
class Spam {
...
private:
Spam(int) {}
static unique_ptr<Spam> create( int i )
{ return std::unique_ptr<Spam>( new Spam(i) ); }
};
and then have Foo
call that instead.
void Foo() {
std::unique_ptr<Spam> spam = Spam::create(10);
...
}
In your case the function make_unique
is trying to create an instance of Spam
and that function is not a friend. Calling a non-friend function from inside a friend function does not imbue the non-friend function with friend status.
To solve this you can write in Foo
:
std::unique_ptr<Spam> spam(new Spam(10));
In your example, Foo()
is a friend
, but it isn't the function that's creating the Spam
- make_unique
is internally calling new Spam
itself. The simple fix is to just have Foo()
actually construct the Spam
directly:
void Foo() {
std::unique_ptr<Spam> spam(new Spam(10));
}