With a Java ExecutorService, how do I complete actively executing tasks but halt the processing of waiting tasks?

前端 未结 3 1073
清歌不尽
清歌不尽 2021-02-13 03:33

I am using an ExecutorService (a ThreadPoolExecutor) to run (and queue) a lot of tasks. I am attempting to write some shut down code that is as graceful as possible.

Exe

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-13 03:43

    The shutdownNow() is exactly what you need. You've missed the 1st word Attempts and the entire 2nd paragraph of its javadoc:

    There are no guarantees beyond best-effort attempts to stop processing actively executing tasks. For example, typical implementations will cancel via Thread.interrupt(), so any task that fails to respond to interrupts may never terminate.

    So, only tasks which are checking Thread#isInterrupted() on a regular basis (e.g. in a while (!Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) loop or something), will be terminated. But if you aren't checking on that in your task, it will still keep running.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-13 03:45

    I ran into this issue recently. There may be a more elegant approach, but my solution is to first call shutdown(), then pull out the BlockingQueue being used by the ThreadPoolExecutor and call clear() on it (or else drain it to another Collection for storage). Finally, calling awaitTermination() allows the thread pool to finish what's currently on its plate.

    For example:

    public static void shutdownPool(boolean awaitTermination) throws InterruptedException {
    
        //call shutdown to prevent new tasks from being submitted
        executor.shutdown();
    
        //get a reference to the Queue
        final BlockingQueue<Runnable> blockingQueue = executor.getQueue();
    
        //clear the Queue
        blockingQueue.clear();
        //or else copy its contents here with a while loop and remove()
    
        //wait for active tasks to be completed
        if (awaitTermination) {
            executor.awaitTermination(SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
        }
    }
    

    This method would be implemented in the directing class wrapping the ThreadPoolExecutor with the reference executor.

    It's important to note the following from the ThreadPoolExecutor.getQueue() javadoc:

    Access to the task queue is intended primarily for debugging and monitoring. This queue may be in active use. Retrieving the task queue does not prevent queued tasks from executing.

    This highlights the fact that additional tasks may be polled from the BlockingQueue while you drain it. However, all BlockingQueue implementations are thread-safe according to that interface's documentation, so this shouldn't cause problems.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-13 03:58

    You can wrap each submitted task with a little extra logic

    wrapper = new Runnable()
        public void run()
            if(executorService.isShutdown())
                throw new Error("shutdown");
            task.run();
    
    executorService.submit(wrapper);
    

    the overhead of extra checking is negligible. After executor is shutdown, the wrappers will still be executed, but the original tasks won't.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题