Swift: Enums that use closures?

Question

I’m creating an application where an unlimited amount of rules could be applied to an unlimited amount of nodes.

I\'m planning on using core data as the datastore and

Answer 1

    enum FunctionEnum
   {
     case binaryOperation((Double,Double)->Double)
     constant(Double)
   }

1.you can associate values to enum cases , hence it also has type here for example binaryOperation is of type ((Double,Double)->Double) which means its of type a closure which accepts two doubles and return one

Answer 2

Solution

If we want to add a closure to an enum first of all lets define the type of the closure.

typealias Logic = () -> (String)

Then the enum:

enum Rule {
    case SimpleRuleA(Logic)
    case SimpleRuleB(Logic)
    case BigFatComplicatedRule(Logic)
}

That's it! Let's see now how to use this.

Usage

Let's create a couple of Logic(s):

let logic0 : Logic = { return "Logic 0" }
let logic1 : Logic = { return "Logic 1" }

And now a function to process a Rule

func processRule(rule:Rule) -> String {
    switch rule {
    case .SimpleRuleA(let logic): return "Simple Rule A, logic: \(logic())"
    case .SimpleRuleB(let logic): return "Simple Rule B, logic: \(logic())"
    case .BigFatComplicatedRule(let logic): return "Big Fat Complicated Rule, logic: \(logic())"
    }
}

Finally let's combine every possible rule with every possible Logic...

let aWithLogic0 = Rule.SimpleRuleA(logic0)
let aWithLogic1 = Rule.SimpleRuleA(logic1)
let bWithLogic0 = Rule.SimpleRuleB(logic0)
let bWithLogic1 = Rule.SimpleRuleB(logic1)
let fatWithLogic0 = Rule.BigFatComplicatedRule(logic0)
let fatWithLogic1 = Rule.BigFatComplicatedRule(logic1)

... and let's test it

processRule(aWithLogic0) // "Simple Rule A, logic: Logic 0"
processRule(aWithLogic1) // "Simple Rule A, logic: Logic 1"
processRule(bWithLogic0) // "Simple Rule B, logic: Logic 0"
processRule(bWithLogic1) // "Simple Rule B, logic: Logic 1"
processRule(fatWithLogic0) // "Big Fat Complicated Rule, logic: Logic 0"
processRule(fatWithLogic1) // "Big Fat Complicated Rule, logic: Logic 1"

Is this solution close to what you had in mind?