I would use this structure:
ParentId, CategoryId, Title
null, 1, Home
null, 2, Business
null, 3, Hobbies
1, 4, Gardening
1, 5, Kitchen
1, 6, ...
2, 7, Development
2, 8, Marketing
2, 9, ...
3, 10, Soccer
3, 11, Reading
3, 12, ...
In detail:
- only use one table, which references itself, so that you can have unlimited depth of categories
- use technical ids (using
IDENTITY
, or similar), so that you can have more than 10 subcategories
- if required add a human readable column for category-numbers as separate field
As long as you are only using two levels of categories you can still select like this:
SELECT BizTitle FROM tblBiz WHERE ParentId = 3 AND CategoryId = 11
The new hierarchyid
feature of SQL server also looks quite promising: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb677173.aspx
What I don't like about the Nested Set Model:
- Inserting and deleting items in the Nested Set Model is a quite comlicated thing and requires expensive locks.
- One can easily create inconsistencies which is prohibited, if you use the
parent
field in combination with a foreign key constraint.
- Inconsistencies can appear, if
rght
is lower than lft
- Inconsistencies can appear, if a value apprears in several
rght
or lft
fields
- Inconsistencies can appear, if you create gaps
- Inconsistencies can appear, if you create overlaps
- The Nested Set Model is in my opinion more complex and therefore not as easy to understand. This is absolutely subjective, of course.
- The Nested Set Model requires two fields, instead of one - and so uses more disk space.