Finding the index of an item in a list

后端 未结 30 3250
你的背包
你的背包 2020-11-21 05:28

Given a list [\"foo\", \"bar\", \"baz\"] and an item in the list \"bar\", how do I get its index (1) in Python?

相关标签:
30条回答
  • 2020-11-21 05:37

    All of the proposed functions here reproduce inherent language behavior but obscure what's going on.

    [i for i in range(len(mylist)) if mylist[i]==myterm]  # get the indices
    
    [each for each in mylist if each==myterm]             # get the items
    
    mylist.index(myterm) if myterm in mylist else None    # get the first index and fail quietly
    

    Why write a function with exception handling if the language provides the methods to do what you want itself?

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-21 05:37

    Getting all the occurrences and the position of one or more (identical) items in a list

    With enumerate(alist) you can store the first element (n) that is the index of the list when the element x is equal to what you look for.

    >>> alist = ['foo', 'spam', 'egg', 'foo']
    >>> foo_indexes = [n for n,x in enumerate(alist) if x=='foo']
    >>> foo_indexes
    [0, 3]
    >>>
    

    Let's make our function findindex

    This function takes the item and the list as arguments and return the position of the item in the list, like we saw before.

    def indexlist(item2find, list_or_string):
      "Returns all indexes of an item in a list or a string"
      return [n for n,item in enumerate(list_or_string) if item==item2find]
    
    print(indexlist("1", "010101010"))
    

    Output


    [1, 3, 5, 7]
    

    Simple

    for n, i in enumerate([1, 2, 3, 4, 1]):
        if i == 1:
            print(n)
    

    Output:

    0
    4
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-21 05:41

    Let’s give the name lst to the list that you have. One can convert the list lst to a numpy array. And, then use numpy.where to get the index of the chosen item in the list. Following is the way in which you will implement it.

    import numpy as np
    
    lst = ["foo", "bar", "baz"]  #lst: : 'list' data type
    print np.where( np.array(lst) == 'bar')[0][0]
    
    >>> 1
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-21 05:42

    This solution is not as powerful as others, but if you're a beginner and only know about forloops it's still possible to find the first index of an item while avoiding the ValueError:

    def find_element(p,t):
        i = 0
        for e in p:
            if e == t:
                return i
            else:
                i +=1
        return -1
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-21 05:43
    >>> ["foo", "bar", "baz"].index("bar")
    1
    

    Reference: Data Structures > More on Lists

    Caveats follow

    Note that while this is perhaps the cleanest way to answer the question as asked, index is a rather weak component of the list API, and I can't remember the last time I used it in anger. It's been pointed out to me in the comments that because this answer is heavily referenced, it should be made more complete. Some caveats about list.index follow. It is probably worth initially taking a look at the documentation for it:

    list.index(x[, start[, end]])
    

    Return zero-based index in the list of the first item whose value is equal to x. Raises a ValueError if there is no such item.

    The optional arguments start and end are interpreted as in the slice notation and are used to limit the search to a particular subsequence of the list. The returned index is computed relative to the beginning of the full sequence rather than the start argument.

    Linear time-complexity in list length

    An index call checks every element of the list in order, until it finds a match. If your list is long, and you don't know roughly where in the list it occurs, this search could become a bottleneck. In that case, you should consider a different data structure. Note that if you know roughly where to find the match, you can give index a hint. For instance, in this snippet, l.index(999_999, 999_990, 1_000_000) is roughly five orders of magnitude faster than straight l.index(999_999), because the former only has to search 10 entries, while the latter searches a million:

    >>> import timeit
    >>> timeit.timeit('l.index(999_999)', setup='l = list(range(0, 1_000_000))', number=1000)
    9.356267921015387
    >>> timeit.timeit('l.index(999_999, 999_990, 1_000_000)', setup='l = list(range(0, 1_000_000))', number=1000)
    0.0004404920036904514
     
    

    Only returns the index of the first match to its argument

    A call to index searches through the list in order until it finds a match, and stops there. If you expect to need indices of more matches, you should use a list comprehension, or generator expression.

    >>> [1, 1].index(1)
    0
    >>> [i for i, e in enumerate([1, 2, 1]) if e == 1]
    [0, 2]
    >>> g = (i for i, e in enumerate([1, 2, 1]) if e == 1)
    >>> next(g)
    0
    >>> next(g)
    2
    

    Most places where I once would have used index, I now use a list comprehension or generator expression because they're more generalizable. So if you're considering reaching for index, take a look at these excellent Python features.

    Throws if element not present in list

    A call to index results in a ValueError if the item's not present.

    >>> [1, 1].index(2)
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    ValueError: 2 is not in list
    

    If the item might not be present in the list, you should either

    1. Check for it first with item in my_list (clean, readable approach), or
    2. Wrap the index call in a try/except block which catches ValueError (probably faster, at least when the list to search is long, and the item is usually present.)
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-21 05:43
    a = ["foo","bar","baz",'bar','any','much']
    
    indexes = [index for index in range(len(a)) if a[index] == 'bar']
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题