What's the difference between std::to_string, boost::to_string, and boost::lexical_cast?

后端 未结 3 1854
半阙折子戏
半阙折子戏 2021-02-12 10:41

What\'s the purpose of boost::to_string (found in boost/exception/to_string.hpp) and how does it differ from boost::lexical_cast

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-12 11:17

    Here is a benchmark that I found for the integer to string conversion, hope it doesn't change much for float and double Fast integer to string conversion benchmark in C++.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-12 11:33

    std::to_string, available since C++11, works on fundamental numeric types specifically. It also has a std::to_wstring variant.

    It is designed to produce the same results that sprintf would.

    You may choose this form to avoid dependencies on external libraries/headers.


    The throw-on-failure function boost::lexical_cast<std::string> and its non-throwing cousin boost::conversion::try_lexical_convert work on any type that can be inserted into a std::ostream, including types from other libraries or your own code.

    Optimized specializations exist for common types, with the generic form resembling:

    template< typename OutType, typename InType >
    OutType lexical_cast( const InType & input ) 
    {
        // Insert parameter to an iostream
        std::stringstream temp_stream;
        temp_stream << input;
    
        // Extract output type from the same iostream
        OutType output;
        temp_stream >> output;
        return output;
    }
    

    You may choose this form to leverage greater flexibility of input types in generic functions, or to produce a std::string from a type that you know isn't a fundamental numeric type.


    boost::to_string isn't directly documented, and seems to be for internal use primarily. Its functionality behaves like lexical_cast<std::string>, not std::to_string.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-12 11:36

    There are more differences: boost::lexical_cast works a bit different when converting double to string. Please consider the following code:

    #include <limits>
    #include <iostream>
    
    #include "boost/lexical_cast.hpp"
    
    int main()
    {
        double maxDouble = std::numeric_limits<double>::max();
        std::string str(std::to_string(maxDouble));
    
        std::cout << "std::to_string(" << maxDouble << ") == " << str << std::endl;
        std::cout << "boost::lexical_cast<std::string>(" << maxDouble << ") == "
                  << boost::lexical_cast<std::string>(maxDouble) << std::endl;
    
        return 0;
    }
    

    Results

    $ ./to_string
    std::to_string(1.79769e+308) == 179769313486231570814527423731704356798070600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.000000
    boost::lexical_cast<std::string>(1.79769e+308) == 1.7976931348623157e+308
    

    As you can see, the boost version uses exponential notation (1.7976931348623157e+308) whereas std::to_string prints every digit, and six decimal places. One may be more useful than another for your purposes. I personally find the boost version more readable.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题