Binary operator '==' cannot be applied to two operands

前端 未结 2 1520
孤独总比滥情好
孤独总比滥情好 2021-02-12 09:34

I have a class with the protocol Equatable. The class looks like this:

class Item: Equatable {

    let item: [[Modifications: String]]

    init(it         


        
相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-02-12 10:04

    In your == function for Item objects, you need to specify further how to compare two types of arrays of dictionaries (specifically, two types of [[Modifications: String]]).

    The following working solution compares your item arrays element by element (dictionary by dictionary), and == returns true only if the arrays contain the same number of dictionaries, and if all entries are alike and ordered the same fashion in the array of dictionares

    func ==(lhs: Item, rhs: Item) -> Bool {
    
        if lhs.item.count == rhs.item.count {
            for (i, lhsDict) in lhs.item.enumerate() {
                if lhsDict != rhs.item[i] {
                    return false
                }
            }
            return true
        }
        else {
            return false
        }
    }
    
    class Item : Equatable {
    
        let item: [[Modifications: String]]
    
        init(item: [[Modifications: String]]) {
            self.item = item
        }
    }
    

    You probably want to modify this into the form you actually want to use for comparison, but I hope you get the gist of it.

    Note also that, if testing this in a playground, it's important that your == function definition func ==(lhs: Item, rhs: Item) -> Bool { .. should precede your class definition, otherwise you will get an error of nonconformance to Equatable.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-12 10:10

    Update: SE-0143 Conditional conformances has been implemented in Swift 4.2.

    As a consequence, your code does compile now. And if you define Item as a struct

    struct Item: Equatable {
        let item: [[Modifications: String]]
    
        init(item: [[Modifications: String]]) {
            self.item = item
        }
    }
    

    then the compiler synthesizes the == operator automatically, compare SE-0185 Synthesizing Equatable and Hashable conformance


    (Pre Swift 4.1 answer:)

    The problem is that even if == is defined for the dictionary type [Modifications: String], that type does not conform to Equatable. Therefore the array comparison operator

    public func ==<Element : Equatable>(lhs: [Element], rhs: [Element]) -> Bool
    

    cannot be applied to [[Modifications: String]].

    A possible concise implementation of == for Item would be

    func ==(lhs: Item, rhs: Item) -> Bool {
        return lhs.item.count == rhs.item.count 
               && !zip(lhs.item, rhs.item).contains {$0 != $1 }
    }
    

    Your code compiles for [[String: String]] – if the Foundation framework is imported, as @user3441734 correctly said – because then [String: String] is automatically converted to NSDictionary which conforms to Equatable. Here is a "proof" for that claim:

    func foo<T : Equatable>(obj :[T]) {
        print(obj.dynamicType)
    }
    
    // This does not compile:
    foo( [[Modifications: String]]() )
    
    // This compiles, and the output is "Array<NSDictionary>":
    foo( [[String: String]]() )
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题