DataContractSerializer doesn't call my constructor?

后端 未结 4 1448
感动是毒
感动是毒 2020-11-27 14:49

I just realized something crazy, which I assumed to be completely impossible : when deserializing an object, the DataContractSerializer doesn\'t call the constructor

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2020-11-27 15:11

    Use [OnDeserialized] attribute to initialise your properties.

    // This method is called after the object
    // is completely deserialized. Use it instead of the
    // constructror.
    [OnDeserialized]
    void OnDeserialized(StreamingContext context)
    {
        fullName = firstName + " " + lastName;
    }
    

    Please refer to microsoft guid-lines: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/serialization/serialization-guidelines

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 15:17

    There are some scenario's that wouldn’t be possible without this behavior. Think of the following:

    1) You have an object that has one constructor that sets the new instance to an "initialized" state. Then some methods are called on that instance, that bring it in a "processed" state. You don’t want to create new objects having the "processed" state, but you still want de serialize / deserialize the instance.

    2) You created a class with a private constructor and some static properties to control a small set of allowed constructor parameters. Now you can still serialize / deserialize them.

    XmlSerializer has the behavior you expected. I have had a some problems with the XmlSerializer because it DOES need a default constructor. Related to that, sometimes it makes sense to have private property setters. But the XmlSerializer also needs public getter and setter on properties in order to serialize / deserialize.

    I think of the DataContractSerializer / BinaryFormatter behavior like suspending the state of an instance during serialization and resuming during deserialization. In other words, the instances are not “constructed” but “restored” to an earlier state.

    As you already mentioned, the [OnDeserializing] attribute makes it possible to keep non serialized data in sync.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 15:31

    DataContractSerializer (like BinaryFormatter) doesn't use any constructor. It creates the object as empty memory.

    For example:

        Type type = typeof(Customer);
        object obj = System.Runtime.Serialization.
            FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject(type);
    

    The assumption is that the deserialization process (or callbacks if necessary) will fully initialize it.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-27 15:34

    In my case, i wanted to create an object to use in a lock-clause. I tried implementing IDeserializationCallback (didn't work because callback only runs after properties have been assigned), [OnDeserialized] (didn't work, same previous reason), and ISerializable (didn't work because the class is decorated with the [DataContractAttribute]).

    My workaround was to initialize the field before it's used using Interlocked.CompareExchange. A bit of unnecessary work gets done, but at least now my field gets initialized when a DataContractSerializer creates it.

    Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref _sync, new object(), null);
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题