I did small performance test of Ruby\'s array concat()
vs +
operation and concat()
was way too fast.
I however am not clear on why
According to the Ruby docs, the difference is:
Array#+ :
Concatenation — Returns a new array built by concatenating the two arrays together to produce a third array.
Array#concat :
Array#concat : Appends the elements of other_ary to self.
So the +
operator will create a new array each time it is called (which is expensive), while concat
only appends the new element.
The answer lies in Ruby's underlying C implementation of the +
operator and the concat
methods.
Array#+
rb_ary_plus(VALUE x, VALUE y)
{
VALUE z;
long len, xlen, ylen;
y = to_ary(y);
xlen = RARRAY_LEN(x);
ylen = RARRAY_LEN(y);
len = xlen + ylen;
z = rb_ary_new2(len);
ary_memcpy(z, 0, xlen, RARRAY_CONST_PTR(x));
ary_memcpy(z, xlen, ylen, RARRAY_CONST_PTR(y));
ARY_SET_LEN(z, len);
return z;
}
Array#concat
rb_ary_concat(VALUE x, VALUE y)
{
rb_ary_modify_check(x);
y = to_ary(y);
if (RARRAY_LEN(y) > 0) {
rb_ary_splice(x, RARRAY_LEN(x), 0, y);
}
return x;
}
As you can see, the +
operator is copying the memory from each array, then creating and returning a third array with the contents of both. The concat
method is simply splicing the new array into the original one.