Have a parent class's method access the subclass's constants

Question

For example:

class Animal

 def make_noise
    print NOISE
 end

end

class Dog < Animal
    NOISE = \"bark\"
end

d = Dog.new
d.make_noise # I want this to p         


        

Answer 1

I think that you don't really want a constant; I think that you want an instance variable on the class:

class Animal
  @noise = "whaargarble"
  class << self
    attr_accessor :noise
  end
  def make_noise
    puts self.class.noise
  end
end

class Dog < Animal
  @noise = "bark"
end

a = Animal.new
d = Dog.new
a.make_noise  #=> "whaargarble"
d.make_noise  #=> "bark"
Dog.noise = "WOOF"
d.make_noise  #=> "WOOF"
a.make_noise  #=> "whaargarble"

However, if you are sure that you want a constant:

class Animal
  def make_noise
    puts self.class::NOISE
    # or self.class.const_get(:NOISE)
  end
end

Answer 2

If you're doing this to configure your sub classes so that the base class has access to the constants then you can create a DSL for them like this:

module KlassConfig
  def attr_config(attribute)
    define_singleton_method(attribute) do |*args|
      method_name = "config_#{attribute}"
      define_singleton_method method_name do
        args.first
      end
      define_method method_name do
        args.first
      end
    end
  end
end

class Animal
  extend KlassConfig
  attr_config :noise

  def make_noise
    puts config_noise
  end
end

class Dog < Animal
  noise 'bark'
end

This way is a bit more performant as on each method call you don't have to introspect the class to reach back (or is it forward?) for the constant.

Answer 3

one way to do it without class instance variables:

class Animal

 def make_noise
   print self.class::NOISE
 end

end

class Dog < Animal
  NOISE = "bark"
end

d = Dog.new
d.make_noise # prints bark

Answer 4

I think you have the wrong concept here. Classes in Ruby are similar to classes in Java, Smalltalk, C#, ... and all are templates for their instances. So the class defines the structure and the behavior if its instances, and the parts of the structure and behavior of the instances of its subclasses but not vice versae.

So direct access from a superclass to a constant in a subclass is not possible at all, and that is a good thing. See below how to fix it. For your classes defined, the following things are true:

• class Animal defines the method make_noise.
• instances of class Animal may call the method make_noise.
• class Dogdefines the constant NOISE with its value.
• instances of Dog and the class Dog itself may use the constant NOISE.

What is not possible:

• Instances of Animal or the class Animal itself have access to constants of the class Dog.

You may fix that by the following change:

class Animal
  def make_noise
    print Dog::NOISE
  end
end

But this is bad style, because now, your superclass (which is an abstraction about Dog and other animals) knows now something that belongs to Dog.

A better solution would be:

1. Define an abstract method in class Animal which defines that make_noise should be defined. See the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/6792499/41540.
2. Define in your concrete classes the method again, but now with the reference to the constant.

Answer 5

If you want it the Object-Oriented Way (TM), then I guess you want:

class Animal
  # abstract animals cannot make a noise
end

class Dog < Animal
  def make_noise
    print "bark"
  end
end

class Cat < Animal
  def make_noise
    print "meow"
  end
end

d = Dog.new
d.make_noise # prints bark

c = Cat.new
c.make_noise # prints meow

If you want to refactor to prevent duplicating the code for print:

class Animal
  def make_noise
    print noise
  end
end

class Dog < Animal
  def noise
    "bark"
  end
end

class Cat < Animal
  def noise
    if friendly
      "meow"
    else
      "hiss"
    end
  end
end

d = Dog.new
d.make_noise # prints bark

c = Cat.new
c.make_noise # prints meow or hiss