Are parenthesis needed to get the address of a struct member from a pointer to the struct as in “&(s->var)” vs “&s->var”?

Question

I have a struct str *s;

Let var be a variable in s. Is &s->var equal to &(s->var)?

Answer 1

Yes.

(-> is higher precedence than &. See http://cppreference.com/wiki/language/operator_precedence)

Answer 2

Behavior-wise, yes they are equivalent since the member access -> operator has a higher precedence than the address-of & operator.

Readibility-wise, the second one &(s->var) is much more readable than &s->var and should be preferred over the first form. With the second form, &(s->var), you won't have to second-guess what it's actually doing as you know the expression in the parentheses are always evaluated first. When in doubt, use parentheses.

Answer 3

Yes, because the pointer dereference operator -> has higher precedence than the address operator &.

• C operator precedence